Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Blueprint for Children?s Health and the Built Environment
Presented by the Children's Environmental Health Institute

Green Chemistry & Environmental Health

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 103, Number 7-8, July-August 1995 Open Access
spacer
Risk and Revisionism in Arsenic Cancer Risk Assessment

Paul Mushak1 and Annemarie F. Crocetti2

1PB Associates, Durham, NC 27705 USA
2Consultant in Nutrition Epidemiology, New York, NY 10003 USA

Abstract
Oral exposures of nonoccupational populations to environmental inorganic arsenic are associated with skin and internal cancers as well as various noncarcinogenic effects. Cancer risk assessments have been based largely on epidemiological studies of a large population exposed to inorganic arsenic in well water in Taiwan. Criticisms and skepticism of the use of the Taiwanese data for estimating arsenic cancer risks outside of Taiwan, including potential use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for regulatory purposes, have been expressed on various grounds. The nature and extent of such criticisms have sharpened with recent findings in the exposed Taiwanese of increased incidence of internal cancers (bladder, kidney, liver, and lung) , in addition to already-observed skin cancer, coupled with a good likelihood that these findings will produce more stringent arsenic regulation in the United States and elsewhere. These criticisms collectively posit a revisionist view that: 1) cancer incidence among the Taiwanese was amplified by a number of host and environmental factors not applicable elsewhere, 2) the cancer dose-response curve may not be linear at the lower exposures elsewhere, and 3) there is a toxicokinetic and metabolic threshold to cancer risk that was exceeded by the Taiwanese. However, a number of the arguments against wide use of the Taiwanese data are flawed and subject to challenge. We explore some of these arguments and their critical evaluation, particularly as they concern certain exposure, metabolic, and nutritional determinants of the cancer risk of inorganic arsenic in the Taiwanese. Key words: , , . Environ Health Perspect 103:684-689 (1995)

Address correspondence to P. Mushak, PB Associates, Suite G-3, 714 Ninth Street, Durham, NC 27705 USA.

Received 23 February 1995 ; accepted 10 April 1995.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML format.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov