Quantcast
Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives Podcasts - The Researcher's Perspectives
Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




EHP on Twitter

AAAR

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 104, Number 9, September 1996 Open Access
spacer
An Evaluation of Precaution-based Approaches As EMF Policy Tools in Community Environments

Jack Sahl1 and Michael Dolan2

1Health Research and Evaluation Division, Southern California Edison Company, Rosemead, CA 91770 USA; 2EMF Advisory Group, Electricity Supply Association of Australia Limited, Melbourne VIC 30001 Australia

Abstract

This paper explores the use of precaution-based approaches as policy tools when responding to concerns about power-frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF) in community environments. The combination of public concern and scientific uncertainty about potential health impacts from exposure to EMF challenges society to adopt EMF policies that balance the benefits of electric power against the possibility that some aspect of the use of electricity may be harmful. Inappropriate policy responses can undermine the economics of society's use of electricity and have other adverse consequences on public health. These adverse consequences result from the inappropriate diversion of scarce public and private resources. Precaution-based approaches are rooted in individual concepts of common sense and can be an effective component of a comprehensive set of EMF policy options. Precaution-based approaches do not replace science-based policy options and should only be used when the available science-based guidelines are not applicable. The application of these approaches should balance the real and expected costs and benefits of taking or not taking action. Given our current scientific knowledge, actions taken to reduce EMF exposure should necessarily be low cost because the expected benefits are uncertain. Society also needs to avoid adopting EMF policies that could incur high costs from distorting resources from other, more important, personal and public health priorities. Key words: , . Environ Health Perspect 104:908-911 (1996)

Address correspondence to J. Sahl, Health Research and Evaluation Division, Southern California Edison Company, 8631 Rush Street, Rosemead, CA 91770 USA.

Received 9 January 1996 ; accepted 9 May 1996.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML format.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files located on this site.