Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Free Trail Issue
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements Volume 104, Number S5, October 1996 Open Access
spacer
COMPACT and Molecular Structure in Toxicity Assessment: A Prospective Evaluation of 30 Chemicals Currently Being Tested for Rodent Carcinogenicity by the NCI/NTP

David F.V. Lewis, C. Ioannides, and D.V. Parke

Molecular Toxicology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom

Abstract

A new series of 30 miscellaneous National Toxicology Program chemicals has been evaluated prospectively for carcinogenicity and overt toxicity by COMPACT (Computer Optimised Molecular Parametric Analysis for Chemical Toxicity: CYP1A and CYP2E1) . Evaluations were also made by Hazardexpert, and for metal ion redox potentials ; and these, together with COMPACT, were compared with results from the Ames test for mutagenicity in Salmonella, the micronucleus test, and 90-day subchronic rodent pathology. Seven of the 30 chemicals (nitromethane, chloroprene, xylenesulfonic acid, furfuryl alchohol, anthraquinone, emodin, cinnamaldehyde) were positive for potential carcinogenicity in the COMPACT evaluation ; xylenesulphonic acid and furfuryl alchohol were only equivocally positive. Four of the 30 chemicals--scopolamine, D&C Yellow No. 11, citral, cinnamaldehyde--were positive by Hazardexpert ; 6 of 30--D&C Yellow No. 11, 1-chloro-2-propanol, anthraquinone, emodin, sodium nitrite, cinnamaldehyde--were positive in the Ames test ; 2 of 30--phenolphthalein and emodin--were positive in the in vivo cytogenetics test ; and 3 of 30--molybdenum trioxide, gallium arsenide, vanadium pentoxide--were metal compounds with redox potentials of the metal/metal ion indicative of possible carcinogenicity. The overall prediction for carcinogenicity was positive for 12 of 30 chemicals: nitromethane, chloroprene, D&C Yellow No. 11, molybdenum trioxide, 1-chloro-2-propanol, furfuryl alcohol, gallium arsenide, anthraquinone, emodin, sodium nitrite, cinnamaldehyde, vanadium pentoxide) . This overall prediction has been made on the basis of the results of the computer tests and from consideration of the information from bacterial mutagenicity, together with likely lipid solubility and pathways of metabolism and elimination-- Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 5) :1011-1016 (1996)

Key words: , ,


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML format.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov