Quantcast
Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives Podcasts - The Researcher's Perspectives
Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




EHP on Twitter

AAAR

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 105, Number 1, January 1997 Open Access
spacer
Off the Hook and How Clean is Clean?

Kathryn S. Brown, Harvey Black

Abstract


For 30 years, an Alabama plant released mercury and chloroform into wastewater. Under the Superfund program, Olin Corporation was named responsible for cleaning up the toxic waste at a cost of at least $10 million, and had agreed to do so. But during the routine signing of a payment agreement between the Department of Justice and Olin, Judge W. Brevard Hand dismissed the case, saying that Superfund could not be applied retroactively.

Superfund purposely does not address retroactive liability. The issue is left up to the courts and, to date, companies have been responsible for cleaning up their toxic waste, regardless of when the pollution occurred. The Olin decision may change all that.

The ruling exemplifies the controversy that has always raged around Superfund. In the words of Mark D. Tucker of Dow Chemical Company, "Everybody agrees they don't like Superfund the ways it is now [but] nobody can agree on what they want instead."

Congress has long debated the propriety of "polluter pays" reasoning, with many feeling that a company should not be penalized for acts that were legal at the time. Environmentalists argue that the legality at the time is irrelevant, that cleaning up the sites is the priority. Predictably, most companies that support Superfund retroactive liability have already paid off most or all of their environmental debt. However, for those companies who are only recently being held accountable for past polluting, the repeal or reform of Superfund could add up to huge savings.

Currently, private parties pay for the clean-up of over 75% of the Superfund sites. If the option of retroactive liability is eliminated, the government will have to come up with as much as $1 billion to cover the lost funds and toxic waste clean-up would slow to a crawl. In the meantime, an estimated 70 million Americans live near a Superfund site, all of which sit abandoned and incapable of supporting any type of home or business.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML format.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files located on this site.