Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
Current Issue



Technical Writer / Editor Position



Summers of Discovery

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

HEI

Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements Volume 110, Number S3, June 2002
Sexually Dimorphic Nonreproductive Behaviors as Indicators of Endocrine Disruption

Bernard Weiss

Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA

Abstract

Measures of cognitive and other behaviors not specifically related to reproduction are often sex-linked. Males and females perform differently on many tasks and often interact with members of their species in dissimilar ways. If such differences are diminished, reversed, or widened by prenatal chemical exposures, a reasonable inference is that exposure interfered with sexual differentiation of the brain, largely, but not exclusively, through interference with the actions of gonadal hormones. Explicit recognition of sex differences in performance is not a prominent feature of toxicity testing, however, except for reproduction studies, and is not a recognized criterion in developmental neurotoxicity testing. In contrast to the low visibility accorded sex differences in testing protocols for the assessment of developmental neurotoxicity, the literature is filled with examples showing that the developing male and female respond differently to many chemical agents, with subsequent expression in behavior. Quite often, even when such differences are reported, further analyses are not carried out nor are subsequent studies conducted for clarification. Moreover, many investigators include only male subjects. Both polychlorinated biphenyls and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) studies provide several examples of striking differences between the behavioral responses of male and female offspring to developmental exposure. They offer examples, as well, of how to approach the study and analysis of such differences. Given the societal importance of risk assessments applied to potential developmental neurotoxicants, studies should be deemed questionable if they fail to include outcome measures based on sexual dimorphisms in nonreproductive behaviors. Key words: , , , , , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 3) :387-391 (2002) .

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2002/suppl-3/387-391weiss/abstract.html


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov