Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Reader Survey
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue





Blueprint for Children?s Health and the Built Environment
Presented by the Children's Environmental Health Institute

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

Environmental Health News

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 114, Number S-1, April 2006 Open Access
spacer
Viewpoint: Policy Requirements for Protecting Wildlife from Endocrine Disruptors

Gwynne Lyons

World Wildlife Fund UK, Norwich, United Kingdom

Abstract
Man-made endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) present a threat to biodiversity, even in remote areas. To date, numerous wildlife species have been affected by EDCs in the environment, but it is likely that many more species are suffering effects that have not yet been reported. Impaired reproduction, damaged brain function, and deficits of the immune system are of particular concern. In order to bring all endocrine-disrupting chemicals under control, the development of screens and tests to identify EDCs must be expedited. However, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) considers that sufficient information is already available to merit action on several such substances. In addition, it must be recognized that proving the mechanism of action for some chemicals may take decades. Therefore, it is important to enable certain chemicals to be brought under stricter control on the basis of strong suspicion of endocrine disruption or biochemical signaling disruption. Furthermore, the risk assessment process itself also must be modified, and some suggestions are discussed in this article. WWF maintains that any effect that could reasonably be expected to affect the population level should be taken forward in environmental risk characterization, in particular, behavioral effects should be given more consideration. Current chemical management policies are not protective, and we argue for modifications in them to be made. Key words: , , , , , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 114(suppl 1) :142-146 (2006) . doi:10.1289/ehp.8070 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 21 October 2005]


This article is part of the monograph "The Ecological Relevance of Chemically Induced Endocrine Disruption in Wildlife."

Address correspondence to G. Lyons, WWF UK, 17 The Avenues, Norwich NR2 3PH, UK. Telephone and fax: 44 1603 507 363. E-mail: lyonswwf@aol.com

The author is a toxics science and policy advisor for the World Wildlife Fund UK, a nonprofit independent conservation organization.

Received 31 January 2005 ; accepted 8 August 2005.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov