Quantcast
Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives Podcasts - The Researcher's Perspectives
Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




EHP on Twitter

AAAR

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 114, Number 2, February 2006 Open Access
spacer
Assessing the Reliability and Credibility of Industry Science and Scientists

Craig S. Barrow1 and James W. Conrad Jr.2

1Dow Chemical Company, Washington, DC, USA; 2American Chemistry Council, Arlington, Virginia, USA

Abstract
The chemical industry extensively researches and tests its products to implement product stewardship commitments and to ensure compliance with governmental requirements. In this commentary we argue that a wide variety of mechanisms enable policymakers and the public to assure themselves that studies performed or funded by industry are identified as such, meet high scientific standards, and are not suppressed when their findings are adverse to industry's interests. The more a given study follows these practices and standards, the more confidence one can place in it. No federal laws, rules, or policies express a presumption that scientific work should be ignored or given lesser weight because of the source of its funding. To the contrary, Congress has consistently mandated that agencies allow interested or affected parties to provide information to them and fairly consider that information. All participants in scientific review panels should disclose sources of potential biases and conflicts of interest. The former should be considered in seeking a balanced panel rather than being used as a basis for disqualification. Conflicts of interest generally do require disqualification, except where outweighed by the need for a person's services. Within these constraints, chemical industry scientists can serve important and legitimate functions on scientific advisory panels and should not be unjustifiably prevented from contributing to their work. Key words: , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 114: 153-155 (2006) . doi:10.1289/ehp.8417 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 6 October 2005]


Address correspondence to J.W. Conrad Jr., American Chemistry Council, 1300 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22209 USA. Telephone: (703) 741-5166. Fax: (703) 741-6093. E-mail: james_conrad@americanchemistry.com

C.B. is employed by the Dow Chemical Company. James Conrad is employed by the American Chemistry Council, a trade association that represents chemical manufacturers.

Received 21 June 2005 ; accepted 6 October 2005.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files located on this site.