The Second NIEHS Predictive-Toxicology Evaluation Experiment: 30 Chemical Carcinogenicity Bioassays
Environmental Health Perspectives 104, Supplement 5, October 1996
Use of the Syrian Hamster Embryo Cell Transformation Assay for Carcinogenicity Prediction of Chemicals Currently Being Tested by the National Toxicology Program
in Rodent Bioassays
Gary A. Kerckaert,1 Roger Brauninger,2 Robert A. LeBoeuf,1 and Robert J. Isfort1
1The Procter & Gamble Co., Cincinnati, Ohio; 2Corning Hazleton, Vienna, Virginia
Abstract
The Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay was used to predict the carcinogenicity of 26 chemicals currently being tested in the rodent bioassay by the National Toxicology Program as part of its program titled "Strategies for Predicting Chemical Carcinogenesis in Rodents." Of these 26 chemicals, 17 were found to be positive in the SHE cell transformation assay while 9 were negative. Carcinogenicity predictions were made for these chemicals, based upon the SHE cell transformation assay results. Our predictions will be compared with the rodent bioassay results as they become available. -- Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 5):1075-1084 (1996)
Key words: SHE assay, cell transformation, carcinogenicity prediction, rodent bioassay
This paper is part of the NIEHS Predictive-Toxicology Evaluation Project. Manuscript received 9 January 1996; manuscript accepted 3 April 1996.
Address correspondence to Dr. G.A. Kerckaert, The Procter & Gamble Co., P.O. Box 538707 Cincinnati, OH 45253-8707. Telephone: (513) 627-2285. Fax: (513) 627-1087.
Abbreviations used: SHE, Syrian hamster embryo; MT, morphological transformation; NTP, National Toxicology Program.
Introduction
Since the seminal work of Berwald and Sachs (1), Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells have been used to evaluate the potential of a wide variety of chemical and physical agents to induce morphological transformation (2). SHE cells are diploid, genetically stable, of finite lifespan, and capable of metabolizing many chemicals to their ultimate carcinogenic form (3). SHE cells have also been used in a number of laboratories to study mechanisms of carcinogenesis (4). Following carcinogen exposure, SHE cells display a multistage pattern of progression to neoplasia that is similar to the multistage progression of in vivo carcinogenesis (4-6). Because of these factors, SHE cells are an attractive model for determining the neoplastic transformation potential of chemical agents.
More than 472 chemical/physical agents have been tested in the SHE cell transformation assay (2). Of these 472 agents, 213 have in vivo rodent carcinogenicity data available. Of these 213 agents, 177 were rodent carcinogens and 36 were noncarcinogens. For these agents, the SHE cell transformation assay has a concordance with the rodent bioassay of 80% (171/213), a sensitivity of 82% (146/177), and a specificity of 69% (25/36). Recently, we have modified the methodology used to conduct the SHE cell transformation assay, principally by reducing the culture medium pH from 7.3 to 6.7 (7). Using this modified protocol, we have tested over 56 chemicals, including 30 carcinogens and 18 noncarcinogens (8). The SHE cell transformation assay conducted with the reduced pH methodology has an overall concordance with the rodent bioassay of 85% (41/48), a sensitivity of 87% (26/30), and a specificity of 83% (15/18). It is our current position that SHE cell transformation assay data, in combination with other information such as structure activity relationship analysis, genetic toxicity results, and when available subchronic toxicity data and metabolism considerations, can be used for predicting rodent carcinogenicity.
Twenty-six of the chemicals currently being tested for rodent carcinogenicity by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) were provided to us for predicting the outcome of these bioassays using the SHE cell transformation assay. We submit our predictions based upon SHE cell transformation assay results in the hope that the SHE cell transformation assay will become a method used for improved carcinogenicity prediction and risk assessment.
Methods
A description of the protocol for conduct of the reduced pH SHE cell transformation assay was originally published in 1989 (9). A more detailed description of this protocol is currently in press (7). Briefly, the methods we use are as follows: A cytotoxicity screen is done initially to determine a dose level that produces 50% or greater cytotoxicity, based on reduction in cloning efficiency. This is the top dose tested, with at least four additional doses tested, down to a dose level that causes minimal cytotoxicity. The SHE cell transformation assay is typically done in two individual trials, each consisting of the five test chemical doses and a solvent control (usually dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] or culture medium) plus a positive control (benzo[a]pyrene). Each trial consists of 20 culture dishes/test-chemical treatment group, with between 25 and 45 SHE cell colonies per culture dish to generate the approximately 1000 or more colonies necessary for adequate assay sensitivity. The cells are exposed to test chemical for either 24 hr followed by 6 to 7 days of growth or for 7 days, after which the colonies are fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa and scored for morphological transformation with a stereo microscope. With pooled data from at least two trials, morphological transformation (MT) frequencies (number of MTs/total colonies scored 
100) are determined for each dose level, and a Fisher's exact test (10) is conducted comparing the transformation frequency of the solvent control pairwise with each test chemical dose group. A trend test (11) is also conducted on the pooled transformation frequency/dose group data. A test chemical is considered positive in the SHE cell transformation assay if it causes a statistically significant (p<0.05) increase in MT (relative to the solvent control) in at least two dose groups, or if it causes a statistically significant increase in MT in one dose with a statistically significant (p<0.05) positive dose-response trend test. If either the 24-hr or the 7-day exposure is positive, the overall SHE cell transformation assay call for a test chemical is positive. Our predictions of carcinogenicity for the chemicals tested in this study are based exclusively on the SHE cell transformation assay results.
Table 1.
Table 1. Continued
Table 1. Continued
Table 1. Continued
Table 1. Continued
Table 2.
Table 2. Continued
Table 2. Continued
Results and Discussion
As part of the NTP program "Strategies for Predicting Chemical Carcinogenesis in Rodents," we tested in the SHE cell transformation assay 26 of the chemicals being evaluated by the NTP in the rodent bioassay. Overall, 17 of the 26 chemicals gave a positive response in the SHE cell transformation assay, while 9 chemicals gave a negative response (Table 1). Initially, a 24-hr test chemical exposure SHE cell transformation assay was conducted on each of the 26 chemicals. Using this exposure regimen, 14 chemicals were positive (Table 1). For those chemicals that were negative with a 24-hr exposure SHE cell transformation assay, an additional 7-day exposure SHE cell transformation assay was performed. Of the 12 chemicals that were negative in the 24-hr exposure SHE cell transformation assay, 3 were positive in the 7-day exposure assay, resulting in an overall SHE cell transformation assay call of positive for these three chemicals. We have previously seen this response (24-hr negative, 7-day positive) with several chemicals in the SHE cell transformation assay (8). Evidently, chemicals that give a negative 24-hr exposure SHE cell transformation assay result and a positive 7-day exposure result must be continuously present in the culture medium for the induction of morphological transformation. As discussed previously (8), this pattern (24-hr negative, 7-day positive) indicates a reversible transformation effect that may result from a promotionlike mechanism of action compared to a 24-hr positive SHE cell transformation assay result, which reflects a stable, transforming event.
In addition to SHE results, Table 2 includes rodent bioassay predictions for the 26 chemicals based exclusively on SHE cell transformation assay results (Table 2, column 4). The predictions presented in this report are an attempt to demonstrate the usefulness and validity of the SHE assay in chemical carcinogenicity prediction and risk assessment. Our predictions will be compared with the rodent bioassay results when they become available.
References
1. Berwald Y, Sachs L. In vitro transformation of normal cells to tumor cells by carcinogenic hydrocarbons. J Natl Cancer Inst 35:641-661 (1965).
2. Isfort RJ, Kerckaert GA, LeBoeuf RA. Comparison of the standard and reduced pH Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assays to predict the carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Mutat Res (in press).
3. Barrett JC, Ts'o POP. Mechanistic studies of neoplastic transformation of cells in culture. In: Polycyclic Hydrocarbons and Cancer (Gelboin H, Ts'o POP, eds). New York:Academic Press, 1978;235-267.
4. Isfort RJ, Cody DB, Kerckaert GA, LeBoeuf RA. Growth factor responsiveness and alterations in growth factor homeostasis in Syrian hamster embryo cells during in vitro transformation. Carcinogenesis 15:1203-1209 (1994).
5. Barrett JC. The progressive nature of neoplastic transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells in culture. Prog Exp Tumor Res 24:17-27 (1979).
6. Barrett JC, Hesterberg TW, Thomassen DG. Use of cell transformation systems for carcinogenicity testing and mechanistic studies of carcinogenesis. Pharmacol Rev 36:53s-70s (1984).
7. Kerckaert GA, Isfort RJ, Carr GJ, Aardema MJ, LeBoeuf RA. A comprehensive protocol for conducting the Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay at pH 6.70. Mutat Res (in press).
8. LeBoeuf RA, Kerckaert GA, Aardema MJ, Gibson DP, Brauninger R. The pH 6.7 Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay for assessing the carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Mutat Res (in press).
9. LeBoeuf RA, Kerckaert GA, Poiley JA, Raineri R. An interlaboratory comparison of enhanced morphological transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells cultured under conditions of reduced bicarbonate concentration and pH. Mutat Res 222:205-218 (1989).
10. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford:Blackwell Scientific, 1971.
11. CYTEL Software Corporation, StatXact, Cambridge, MA: Cytel Software Corp., 1991.
Last Update: March 23, 1998
