
| |  | |  | |
| Estrogen Sensitivity of Target Genes and
Expression of Nuclear Receptor
Co-Regulators in Rat
Prostate after Pre- and Postnatal Exposure to the Ultraviolet
Filter 4-Methylbenzylidene Camphor Stefan Durrer, Colin Ehnes, Michaela
Fuetsch, Kirsten Maerkel, Margret Schlumpf, and Walter
Lichtensteiger Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology
and GREEN Tox, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Abstract Background and objectives: In previous studies, we found that the ultraviolet filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) exhibits estrogenic activity, is a preferential estrogen receptor (ER) -β ligand, and interferes with development of female reproductive organs and brain of both sexes in rats. Here, we report effects on male development. Methods: 4-MBC (0.7, 7, 24, 47 mg/kg/day) was administered in chow to the parent generation before mating, during gestation and lactation, and to offspring until adulthood. mRNA was determined in prostate lobes by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction and protein was determined by Western blot analysis. Results: 4-MBC delayed male puberty, decreased adult prostate weight, and slightly increased testis weight. Androgen receptor (AR) , insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) , ER-α, and ER-β expression in prostate were altered at mRNA and protein levels, with stronger effects in dorsolateral than ventral prostate. To assess sensitivity of target genes to estrogens, offspring were castrated on postnatal day 70, injected with 17β-estradiol (E2 ; 10 or 50 µg/kg, sc) or vehicle on postnatal day 84, and sacrificed 6 hr later. Acute repression of AR and IGF-1 mRNAs by E2, studied in ventral prostate, was reduced by 4-MBC exposure. This was accompanied by reduced co-repressor N-CoR (nuclear receptor co-repressor) protein in ventral and dorsolateral prostate, whereas steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) protein levels were unaffected. Conclusions: Our data indicate that 4-MBC affects development of male reproductive functions and organs, with a lowest observed adverse effect level of 0.7 mg/kg. Nuclear receptor coregulators were revealed as targets for endocrine disruptors, as shown for N-CoR in prostate and SRC-1 in uterus. This may have widespread effects on gene regulation. Key words: androgen receptor, development, estrogen receptors, gene expression, insulin-like growth factor-1, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) , N-CoR, prostate, puberty, SRC-1, UV filter. Environ Health Perspect 115(suppl 1) :42–50 (2007) . doi:10.1289/ehp.9134 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 8 June 2007] This article is part of the monograph "Endocrine Disruptors—Exposure Assessment, Novel End Points, and Low-Dose and Mixture Effects." Address correspondence to M. Schlumpf, GREEN Tox, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. Telephone: 41 43 233 9517. Fax: 41 43 268 9573. E-mail: margret.schlumpf@access.uzh.ch Supplemental material is available at http://www.ehponline.org/members/2007/9134/suppl.pdf We thank M. Conscience for support in the conduct of animal experiments and H. Tinwell and J. Ashby (Syngenta Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park, UK) for advice in prostate dissection. The study was supported by Swiss NRP50, EU 5th Framework Programme (EURISKED) , Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, Hartmann-Müller Stiftung, and Olga Mayenfisch Stiftung. The authors declare they have no competing financial interests. Received 1 March 2006 ; accepted 8 February 2006. |
|
|
 |
Exposure to endocrine-active chemicals
has been associated with developmental and reproductive
abnormalities in wildlife and is suspected to interfere with
human endocrine systems. Screening of endocrine activity has
focused on industrial, pharmaceutical, and agricultural
chemicals. However, recent studies indicate that
endocrine-active chemicals are also found among preservatives,
antioxidants and ultraviolet (UV) filters that are constituents
of cosmetics. Some UV filters exhibit estrogenic or
antiandrogenic activity (Holbech et al. 2002; Inui et al. 2003;
Ma et al. 2003; Mueller et al. 2003; Schlumpf et al. 2001a;
Schreurs et al. 2002; Tinwell et al. 2002). 4-MBC, a UV filter
in sunscreens, and 3-benzylidene camphor, a structurally
related UV absorber, are interesting because they exhibit
preference for estrogen receptor (ER)-β (Schlumpf et al.
2004a). UV filters also interfere with the mammalian thyroid
axis (Schmutzler et al. 2004).
These compounds represent a new class of
endocrine-active chemicals. The lipophilic, high-production
volume substances with an increasingly diverse spectrum of use
as cosmetic constituents and technical UV absorbers are
released into the environment and found in lakes and rivers and
in fish (Balmer et al. 2005; Nagtegaal et al. 1997; Poiger
et al.
2004). Their main sources are sewage treatment plant (STP)
effluents (Plagellat et al. 2006). UV filters in sunscreens may
reach humans and animals via the food web, direct application
of cosmetics (Hayden et al. 1997; Janjua et al. 2004), and
contacts with UV stabilizers in plastics, clothing, curtains,
and food (Kawamura et al. 2003).
We investigated effects of pre- and
postnatal exposure to 4-MBC in rats. Data on female littermates
and brain of both sexes are published (Durrer et al. 2005;
Maerkel et al. 2005, 2007). Here, we report on effects in male
offspring. The treatment period overlaps with periods of
urogenital tract development during pre- and early postnatal
life that are sensitive to unbalanced hormonal status. Prostate
development is testosterone dependent and sensitive to
estrogens (Vom Saal et al. 1997. Woodham et al. 2003).
Perinatal estrogen exposure permanently imprints prostate
development and is associated with increased incidence of
prostate hyperplasia, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. The
investigation revealed effects on classic toxicologic end
points, expression of estrogen-regulated genes at mRNA and
protein levels, estrogen sensitivity of target genes, and
nuclear receptor co-repressor levels.
Chemicals. 3-(4-methylbenzylidene)
camphor (4-MBC; Eusolex 6300 CAS no. 36861-47-9, purity
99.7–99.9%) was purchased from Merck (Dietikon,
Switzerland) and 17β-estradiol (E2) from Calbiochem (Lucerne, Switzerland).
Experimental animals. Long Evans rats
purchased from Mřllegaard
Breeding and Research Centre (Ejby, Denmark) were bred under
controlled illumination (lights on 0200–1600 hours) and
temperature (22°C ± 1°C) with free access to
food and water. The animal facility is run by the Institute of
Laboratory Animal Sciences, University of Zurich.
Microbiological checks are performed every 3 months.
Animal welfare.Animals were treated
humanely and with regard for alleviation of suffering, in line
with the Swiss Law for the Protection of Animals
(Tierschutzgesetz, 9 March 1978) and the Ethical Guidelines for
Animal Experimentation of the Swiss Academy for Medical
Sciences. The project (no. 132/2003) was approved and regularly
supervised by the Committee for Animal Experimentation of the
State of Zurich and the Veterinary Office of the State of
Zurich.
Experimental design. Food pellets containing 4-MBC.Food
pellets with 4-MBC were prepared by Provimi Kliba AG (Kaiseraugst,
Switzerland).
4-MBC was dissolved in cold-pressed soy oil (Morga;
Ebnat-Kappel, Switzerland) and added to Provimi Kliba chow 3340
to achieve 4-MBC concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 0.33, and 0.66
g/kg
chow, yielding an average daily intake of 0.7, 7, 24, or 47 mg/kg/day.
Control pellets consisted of the same matrix (Provimi Kliba
3340) with 1% of soil oil added. The soy oil preparation
(Morga) was devoid of detectable amounts of phytoestrogens
(manufacturer's information).
4-MBC treatment.We designed the study
to mimic exposure through the food chain. It followed the
design of a two-generation test without F2.
Males and females of the parent generation (5–6 weeks old) were fed
for at least 10 weeks before mating with chow containing 4-MBC
(0.01, 0.1, 0.33, and 0.66 g/kg chow) or with control chow.
Treatment continued throughout pregnancy and lactation and in
the offspring until adulthood. Pregnant dams were weighed on
gestational day (GD)1 (GD1 = 24 hr after onset of mating), GD7,
14, and 22. Offspring were counted on the day of birth
[postnatal day (PND)1 = GD23), and sexed and adjusted to
8–10 animals/litter on PND2. Body weight was recorded on
PND2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, at puberty onset, and in adulthood.
After weaning (PND28), males and females were raised
separately. Additional parameters studied include sex ratio,
survival rate, righting reflex, anogenital distance, and eye
opening (Durrer 2004). Onset of puberty (preputial separation,
vaginal
opening) was investigated in males from PND41 and in females
from PN30. Experiment A, control A, together with 7, 24, and
47
mg/kg 4-MBC, and experiment B, control B, together with 0.7 mg/kg
4-MBC, were run separately (Table 1).
|
Figure 1. Representative
Western blots from dorsolateral prostate of untreated and 4-MBC
(0.7, 7, 24 mg/kg/day)-exposed 12-week-old rat offspring. Actin
= reference protein. Molecular masses of proteins verified by
prestained SDS-PAGE standards (Broad Range, Bio-Rad
Laboratories).
|
|
Figure 2. Levels of mRNAs encoding for insulin-like
growth factor-1 (IGF-1), androgen receptor (AR, ER-α , and
ER-β in
dorsolateral (A) and ventral (B) prostate of untreated
adult (12-week-old) rat offspring and offspring exposed to 4-MBC;
0.7, 7, 24, 47
mg/kg/day in chow. Real-time RT-PCR values were normalized to
cyclophilin and are expressed as percentage of the mean of the
corresponding untreated control (C) [mean ± SE, n = 8, pooled
controls A (n = 8) + B (n = 8)].
|
|
Figure 3. AR,
ER-β and ER-α protein levels in dorsolateral prostate
(DP) and ventral prostate (VP) of untreated and 4-MBC (0.7, 7,
24
mg/kg/day)-exposed 12-week-old rat offspring. Proteins analyzed
by Western blot in the same homogenates as used for mRNA
determination, quantitated by densitometry relative to actin,
expressed as percentage of the mean of the corresponding
control (mean ± SE, n = 7–9). ER-α protein
was not detectable in ventral lobe homogenate.
Different from control: *p < 0.05,
**p < 0.01,
***p < 0.001.
|
|
Figure 4. (A) Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) mRNA 6 hr
after sc injection of E2 [10 µg/kg (10 E2)
or 50 µg/kg
(50 E2)] or vehicle in ventral prostate of castrated
12-week-old rat offspring from control and 4-MBC (0.7, 7, 24
mg/kg/day)-exposed groups. Values normalized to cyclophilin,
as percentage of the corresponding vehicle-injected group (mean ± SE, n = 8). (B) Magnitude of down-regulation of IGF-1 mRNA by
E2 in ventral prostate of castrated adult rat offspring
of control and 4-MBC (0.7, 7, 24 mg/kg/day)-exposed groups.
Values normalized to cyclophilin, as percentage of the
corresponding vehicle-injected group [mean ± SE, n = 8, control =
pooled control groups A (n = 8) + B (n = 8)].
Separate statistics for 0.7-mg/kg group
vs. control B, and 7- and 24-mg/kg groups vs. control A.
Different from corresponding vehicle-injected group: ap < 0.05, aaap < 0.001.
Magnitude of E2 effect different from control: b< 0.05, bbp < 0.01.
|
|
Figure 5. Magnitude
of acute suppression of mRNAs encoding for AR (A), ER-α
(B)
and ER-β (C) in ventral
prostate of castrated adult rat offspring from control (C) and
4-MBC (0.7, 7, 24 mg/kg/day)-exposed groups 6 hr after sc
injection of E2 [10 µg/kg (10 E2)
or 50 µg/kg
(50 E2)]. Values normalized to cyclophilin, as
percentage of the corresponding vehicle-injected group [mean ± SE, n = 8; control = pooled control groups A (n = 8) + B (n =
8)].
Separate statistical analysis for 0.7-mg/kg
group vs. control B, and 7- and 24-mg/kg groups vs. control A: aSignificant
suppression of mRNA by E2 compared with vehicle, p < 0.05. bMagnitude
of suppression by E2 different from untreated control, p < 0.05.
|
|
Figure 6. Steroid
receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and nuclear receptor corepressor
(N-CoR) protein levels (Western-blot) in dorsolateral (dorsal
+
lateral) prostate (DP) and ventral prostate (VP) of untreated
and 4-MBC (0.7, 7, 24 mg/kg/day)-exposed 12-week-old rat
offspring. Proteins analyzed in the same homogenates as used
for mRNA determination, quantitated by densitometry relative
to
actin, expressed as percentage of the mean of the corresponding
control (mean ± SE, n = 7–9).
|
Table 1.

|
Table 2.

|
Table 3.

|
Table 4.

|
Table 5.

|
Table 6.

|
Table 7.

|
Table 8.

|
Male offspring used for molecular
biological analysis of prostate were taken from the same
litters as the females (Durrer et al. 2005). Brain regions of
the same male and female offspring were also analyzed (Maerkel
et al. 2005, 2007). For analysis of male reproductive organ
weights and puberty, offspring from additional litters were
included.
Adult offspring under baseline conditions.
Adult offspring under baseline conditions were raised without further
experimental manipulation except 4-MBC
treatment and sacrificed at 12 weeks by decapitation during
light ether anesthesia. The ventral lobe of prostate (ventral
prostate) and the combined dorsal + lateral lobes (dorsolateral
prostate) were dissected according to J. Ashby (personal
communication). Dorsal and lateral lobes were cut inside the
borderline with adjacent tissue to avoid contaminations and
achieve identical preparation times for ventral and dorsal +
lateral lobes. Therefore, wet weight was determined only for
ventral lobe. Weights of dorsal + lateral and ventral lobes
were determined in 13-month-old 4-MBC–exposed offspring
in an additional series (Supplemental material; http:
//www.ehponline.org/members/2007/9134/suppl.pdf). Both tissue
pieces were immediately frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen.
Estrogen challenge experiment. Acute responsiveness
of estrogen target genes was analyzed in castrated rat offspring.
Castration reduces and
stabilizes endogenous androgens and androgen-derived estrogens.
The same protocol was applied to female offspring (Durrer et
al.
2005; Maerkel et al. 2005, 2007) to compare target gene
responses in both sexes. At 10 weeks, male offspring were taken
out of several litters of control and 4-MBC–exposed
groups (0.01, 0.1, and 0.33 g/kg chow) and castrated under
anesthesia 150 µL/100 g body weight sc of an acqueous
solution containing 12.5% Hypnorm (Janssen-Cilag, Baar,
Switzerland), 12.5% Domitor (Pfizer, Zurich, Switzerland) and
2.5% atropin (Pharmacy of the University Hospital, Zurich,
Switzerland). After 2 weeks recovery (age 12 weeks), they
received an sc injection of E2 [10 or 50 µg/kg in dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO)] or vehicle (DMSO) (injection volume 1 µL/g body
weight) and were decapitated 6 hr later. Effects on prostate
were studied in ventral lobe because dissection was faster and
could be better fitted to a strict time schedule. Animals from
the same litters were studied under baseline conditions.
Quantification
of mRNA by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR). Real-time
RT-PCR was performed as described previously (Durrer et al. 2005).
Prostate tissues
were homogenized in lysis tissue buffer from RNeasy-mini kit
(QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) by polytron rotor-stator
homogenizer; total RNA isolated according to
manufacturers's specifications (QIAGEN). Genomic DNA was
digested by DNase-I (QIAGEN). Quality and concentration of RNA
were determined by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nm, and
RNA integrity was confirmed by an ethidium bromide-stained 2.5%
agarose gel. RNA was stored at –80°C. For reverse
transcription, 10 µg RNA was used in a total volume of
100 µL containing 1 x TaqMan RT buffer (Applied Biosystems,
Rotkreuz, Switzerland), 5.5 mM MgCl2, 500 µM of each deoxynucleoside
triphosphate, 2.5 µM random hexamer primers, 0.4 µM
RNase inhibitor, and 1.25 µL MultiScribe reverse
transcriptase (Applied Biosystems). The mixture was incubated
10 min at 25°C followed by 30 min RT at 48°C and 5 min
RT inactivation at 95°C. RT samples were frozen at
–80°C. Primers and probes were designed using Primer
Express 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems) and were synthesized
by Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). Sequences are summarized
in Table 2. RT-PCR cycle parameters were an initial
denaturating step at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles
at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min in ABI PRISM 7700
Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems).
Sequence Detector Software SDS 2.0
(Applied Biosystems) was used for data analysis. mRNAs were
quantitated according to the standard curve method and
normalized to cyclophilin. Cyclophilin was chosen as reference
because it was found not to be affected by manipulations of
gonadal hormones (Durrer et al. 2005). mRNA levels of ventral
prostates of intact and castrated rats were compared with the
comparative Ct method. ΔCt is the difference of the Ct values
of the target gene and of the reference gene (cyclophilin). The
difference between paired tissue samples (control and treated)
is then obtained as ΔΔCt = [ΔCt (control
tissue) – ΔCt (treated
tissue)]. For a given gene, the n-fold differential expression of a test sample
compared with the control was expressed as 2–ΔΔCt (Applied
Biosystems 2001).
Western blot analysis. Protein levels
were analyzed in the same tissue homogenates as used for mRNA analysis.
Because RNA stability
is most critical, tissue was homogenized in RNA lysis buffer.
Protein concentration was determined by Bradford method
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, München, Germany) using lyophilized
bovine serum albumin (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) as standard.
For acetone precipitation of protein from buffer RLT lysates,
the QIAGEN protocol (http://www1.qiagen.com/literature/protocols/pdf/RY22.pdf)
was used. After addition of 200 mM dithiothreitol (Fluka),
samples (20 µg protein) were subjected to 10% sodium
dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE; Precise Protein Gels; PIERCE Biotechnology, Inc.,
Rockford, IL, USA). The running buffer contained 100 mM Tris
base, 100 mM Hepes, 3 mM SDS. Proteins were transferred onto
nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel,
Germany) in a Trans-Blot apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
After transfer, membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dried
milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.5% (v/v) Tween
20
(blocking buffer). Membranes were then incubated overnight with
the first antibody diluted in blocking buffer. Anti-ER-α
and anti-androgen receptor (AR) (ABR-Affinity BioReagents, Golden,
CO, USA) were diluted 1:5000, ER-β, steroid receptor coactivator-1
(SRC-1) and anti-nuclear receptor co-repressor (N-CoR) (Santa
Cruz Biotech,
Santa Cruz, CA, USA) 1:2,000, 1:2,500, and 1:1,000
respectively, anti-actin (Chemicon Int., Temecula, CA, USA) 1:
100,000, anti-cyclophilin A (Upstate Cell Signaling Solutions,
Lake Placid, NY, USA) 1:10,000. After three washes with
blocking buffer diluted 1:5 with TBS, membranes were incubated
for 2 hr with the appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated
to horseradish peroxidase. Proteins were detected using
chemiluminescence (Pierce). Densitometrical analyses were
performed using AIDA-2D software (Ray-test, Pittsburgh, PA,
USA). Molecular masses were verified by using prestained SDS-PAGE
standards [Broad Range (myosin 204 Da to aprotinin 7 Da)] from
Bio-Rad Laboratories. Binding specificity of antibodies for the
respective proteins was examined with a negative control
sample. Results are expressed as ratio of the protein of
interest to actin to correct for possible differences of
protein loading between samples. Values of treated samples were
expressed as percentage of the mean of the control group loaded
on the same blot (control A and 7- or 24-mg/kg group, control
B
and 0.7-mg/kg group). Gels run in duplicate for the same two
treatment groups yielded analogous effect patterns. All
proteins showed specific signals (Figure 1)with molecular
weights of the expected size described in the literature and
according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Several possible reference proteins were
studied, including β-tubulin used on uterus (Durrer et al.
2005). Actin was found to be more appropriate for prostate tissues.
The reliability of actin was checked by three approaches: a) General
specificity checks; with the antibody used, a clear and
consistent protein signal was obtained (Figure 1). b)
Absolute values of actin did not differ between controls (CON)
and
4-MBC-exposed groups analyzed in the same blot of dorsolateral
prostate (Table 3). c) Actin was compared with cyclophilin, which is
not influenced by estrogen (Durrer et al. 2005), in the same
blot of dorsolateral prostate with samples from control and
treated animals. The ratio cyclophilin protein/actin protein
was the same in controls and 4-MBC-exposed groups (Table 3).
Thus, actin was equivalent to cyclophilin in the present setup.
The latter could not be used as reference because its molecular
weight differs considerably from that of target proteins.
Statistics. Series
A (untreated control A, 7, 24, 47 mg/kg 4-MBC) and B (untreated
control B, 0.7 mg/kg 4-MBC) were analyzed separately because
they had been conducted during different periods. Individual
mRNA was normalized to cyclophilin mRNA and expressed as
percentage of the respective control (A, B). Body weight, organ
weights, and mRNA were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with
Bonferroni pair-wise comparisons and Dunnett's multiple
comparison test for series A (control A vs. treated groups),
and by Student's t-test for series B (control B
vs. 0.7 mg/kg group). Western-blot gels comprised a lane of controls
(A or
B) and a lane of samples of one treatment group. Values of treated
samples were expressed as percentage of the mean of control
samples of individual gels. Differences between control (A or
B) and treated group of individual gels were assessed by
Student's t-test. Preputial separation and vaginal
opening exhibited positively skewed distributions also in controls,
and
were analyzed with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed
by Dunn's multiple comparison test. (GraphPad Prism 4;
GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA ).
Onset of puberty and reproductive organ
weights. 4-MBC
was administered to rats in chow, to the parent generation before
mating, during
pregnancy and lactation, and to the offspring until adulthood
(12 weeks) (Table 1). The treatment delayed puberty onset in
males (preputial separation) at and above 7 mg/kg (Table 4, not
analyzed with 0.7 mg/kg). Two separate experiments started in
summer 2001 and spring 2002 yielded identical results (Table
4).
Body weight at onset of puberty was at control level in males,
but slightly reduced in females. Adult body weights of 4-MBC–exposed
offspring were in the control range (Table 5; Durrer et al.
2005).
Ventral prostate weight
decreased in adult offspring exposed to 7–47 mg/kg 4-MBC
(Table 5). Investigations in 13-month-old offspring showed that
4-MBC
reduced both, ventral as well as dorsal + lateral prostate
weight (Appendix). Absolute testis weight was slightly
increased (Table 5). Epididymis and seminal vesicle weights
were unaffected except for relative epididymis weight at 47 mg/kg.
Higher doses of 4-MBC (24, 47 mg/kg) increased thyroid weight
(Maerkel et al. 2007). Liver weight remained unchanged (data
not shown).
Effect of pre- and postnatal exposure to
4-MBC on gene expression in prostate lobes of adult rat
offspring. mRNA and protein levels
were determined in the same samples of ventral prostate and
dorsolateral prostate (dorsal + lateral lobes) in 12-week-old
offspring under baseline conditions (Table 6; Figures 1 and 2).
AR mRNA and protein levels were reduced (Figures 2, 3). ER-α
expression was lower in ventral than dorsolateral prostate (Table
6; Lau
et al. 1998). 4-MBC down-regulated ER-α mRNA in both
tissues. A decrease in ER-α protein was observed in dorsolateral
prostate; in ventral prostate, the protein was not detectable.
ER-β mRNA was
down-regulated in both prostate parts, but protein was
increased in dorsolateral prostate at 7 mg/kg and unchanged in
ventral prostate (Figure 3). The increase in ER-β protein
coincided with the lowest level of AR protein. Insulin-like
growth factor 1 (IGF-1) mRNA was dose dependently
down-regulated. Effects of 4-MBC on all four genes were greater
in dorsolateral prostate.
Acute response to E2 in adult
castrated rat offspring. To
examine changes in responsiveness of estrogen-regulated genes
to E2 in ventral prostate, offspring from different
litters of untreated control groups A and B and 0.7, 7, and 24 mg/kg/day
4-MBC treatment groups were castrated at 70 days of age, and
after 2 weeks recovery, injected with E2 (10
or 50 µg/kg,
sc) 6 hr before sacrifice (Table 1).
Effects of castration were analyzed by
comparing mRNA levels in ventral prostate of intact adult
control offspring with levels in vehicle-injected castrated
control offspring (comparative Ct method). Castration
increased ER-α, AR, and IGF-1
mRNAs and reduced ER-β mRNA (Table 7). Transcript levels of
castrated, vehicle-injected groups, which represent the
reference level of E2 challenge experiments, did not
differ significantly between controls and 4-MBC–exposed
groups, except for ER-β mRNA at 0.7 mg/kg (Table 8).
Effect of injection of E2. IGF-1 mRNA was down-regulated in ventral
prostate of castrated controls 6 hr after injection of E2 (10
or 50 µg/kg, sc), relative to the vehicle group (Figure
4A). An analogous effect of E2 was observed in 4-MBC–exposed males,
except for one injection group (10 µg/kg E2, 24 mg/kg
4-MBC). However, the magnitude of the suppressive effect of E2 on
IGF-1 mRNA was dose dependently reduced compared with the E2
effect in controls (Figure 4B). AR mRNA was down-regulated by
both doses of E2 in controls, whereas 4-MBC-exposed
animals responded to only 10 µg/kg E2 (Figure
5A). The suppression of AR mRNA by 50 µg/kg
E2 was significantly smaller in 4-MBC–exposed
offspring.
ER-α mRNA was down-regulated by E2 (Figure
5B). ER-β mRNA levels were not significantly changed by E2 in
controls, whereas a small repressive effect was visible in some
4-MBC–exposed groups (signficant at 24 mg/kg after 10 µg/kg
E2. Figure 5C). In contrast to AR and IGF-1, effects of
E2 on mRNAs encoding for ER-α and ER-β did
not differ significantly between control and 4-MBC–exposed
offspring.
Co-regulator protein levels. In 4-MBC–exposed
female littermates, SRC-1 protein levels were decreased in uterus
(Durrer et al. 2005).
This was correlated with reduced inductive effects of E2 on
progesterone receptor and IGF-1. SRC-1 protein levels were not
significantly affected in prostate (Figure 6), but N-CoR
protein levels were reduced after exposure to 0.7, 7 and 24 mg/kg
4-MBC (Figure 6), to 55.3, 64.5, and 76.1% in dorsolateral
prostate, and 102.4, 85.8, and 75.8% in ventral prostate,
respectively.
The present study indicates that exposure
to the UV filter 4-MBC throughout ontogeny until adulthood
affects male sexual development in rats, puberty, reproductive
organ weights, expression, and estrogen sensitivity of
estrogen-regulated genes in prostate and N-CoR protein levels.
Gene expression is also altered in uterus of female littermates
(Durrer et al. 2005) and in brain of the same animals (Maerkel
et al. 2005, 2007).
Developmental exposure to estrogenic
substances can delay puberty in male rats (Biegel et al. 1998;
Masutomi et al. 2003), but data are conflicting [for genistein,
see Masutomi et al. (2003) and Wisniewski et al. (2003)], and
in part negative (Putz et al. 2001b; Takagi et al. 2004).
Observations on hepatic testosterone hydroxylase in prepubertal
males indicate that effects of neonatal estrogen may vary with
dose (Putz et al. 2001b). The delay of male puberty by 4-MBC,
which binds to ER (Schlumpf et al. 2004a) but not AR (Ma et
al.
2003), may be linked with its estrogenic activity, but it
should be noted that the chemical also interacts with the
thyroid axis (Maerkel et al. 2007; Schlumpf et al. 2004b;
Schmutzler et al. 2004). The changes in testis weight decrease
at PN14 (Schlumpf et al. 2001b), and the slight increase that
occurs in adulthood may also be linked with estrogenic
activity, as testis weight was reduced on day 18 after neonatal
diethylstilbestrol (Atanassova et al. 2000) and increased in
adulthood after low-dose neonatal E2 (Putz et al.
2001b).
Most conspicuous changes were noted in
prostate with a marked decrease in weight as demonstrated for
ventral prostate and in an additional study also for
dorsolateral prostate. Prostate development appears to be
enhanced by slightly supernormal estrogen levels (Nagel et al.
1997; Timms et al. 1999; vom Saal et al. 1997) but inhibited
by
higher estrogen levels (Prins 1992; Putz et al. 2001a).
Activational responses to androgens are similarly enhanced or
reduced (Naslund and Coffey 1986; Rajfer and Coffey 1978).
Because 4-MBC does not bind to AR (Ma et al. 2003), the
reduction in prostate weight probably resulted from its
estrogenic activity. The 4-MBC-induced reduction of AR may also
be involved. Effects of 4-MBC resembled developmental low-dose
actions of estrogen with respect to testis but high-dose
actions with respect to puberty and prostate weight, suggesting
differences in sensitivity of target systems.
The changes in gene expression in
prostate of adult offspring may have resulted from effects of
4-MBC during ontogeny, from ongoing exposure in adulthood or
from a
combination of both. mRNAs encoding for IGF-1, AR, ER-α,
and ER-β, and AR and
ER-α proteins were down-regulated in dorsolateral and
ventral prostate, with statistical significance of changes in
mRNA and protein at the same dose levels. The reduction of ER-β
mRNA is reminiscent of observations after neonatal estrogen
treatment
(Prins et al. 1998). Dose–response curves appear to be
monotonic, with the exception of ER-β protein and
possibly N-CoR in dorsolateral prostate. The increase in ER-β
protein at 7 mg/kg, with mRNA at control level, is not explainable.
It
might
reflect combined effects on receptor synthesis and degradation.
4-MBC exhibits partial agonist features (Schlumpf et al.
2001a), and partial agonists can inhibit proteasomal ER
degradation (Fan et al. 2004; Laios et al. 2003), but this
should influence also ER-β in ventral prostate and ER-α levels.
Lowest AR protein levels coincided with
the ER-β peak in dorsolateral prostate. Mice lacking ER-β
exhibit AR up-regulation in prostate (Cheng G et al. 2002).
Because 4-MBC
is a preferential ER-β ligand (Schlumpf et al. 2004a), actions
mediated by ER-β may have contributed to reduced AR expression.
AR mRNA is also down-regulated by genistein, considered to be
an ER-β ligand (Fritz et al. 2002). However, expression of
AR probably was affected by additional mechanisms such as
impairment of prostate development through effects on ER-α.
Neonatal exposure to estrogenic substances can lead to reduced
or
enhanced AR expression in adulthood (Prins and Birch 1995; vom
Saal et al. 1997). The difference has been ascribed exclusively
to dosage, but preference of a ligand for ER-α or ER-β
might also influence the effect pattern. Provided they were
already
present in early life, the down-regulation of AR, ER-α and
IGF-1 may all have contributed to impaired prostate development.
ER-α has been
associated with proliferation and branching (Asano et al. 2003;
Omoto et al. 2005), IGF-1 also influences prostate development
and appears to be involved in enhanced branching in response
to
estrogen (Gupta 2000; Torring et al. 1997).
Endocrine regulation may be disturbed by
changes in estrogen sensitivity of target genes. To obtain
information on this aspect, the effect of E2 on gene
expression in ventral prostate was studied in an acute
challenge experiment in littermates of the males studied under
baseline conditions. Endogenous hormone levels were reduced and
stabilized by castration. Castration-induced changes in AR, ER-α
and ER-β and IGF-1
mRNA expression corresponded to previous observations (Asano
et al. 2003; Bacher et al. 1993; Nickerson et al. 1999). Acute
E2 injection elicited the expected down-regulation
of AR mRNA, which may be mediated via ER-β (Weihua et al.
2002). A suppressive effect of E2 on IGF-1 has previously been observed in prostate in
the absence of testosterone (Nellemann et al. 2005) and is also
indicated by observations with the antiestrogen ICI 182,780
(Huynh et al. 2001). Exposure to 4-MBC reduced the suppressive
effect of E2 on both, AR and IGF-1 mRNA expression,
indicating a reduction of sensitivity of the two genes to the
natural estrogen. In contrast, down-regulation of ER-α and
ER-β by E2
remained unaffected. The direction of change in estrogen
sensitivity induced by 4-MBC was the same in uterus (Durrer et al.
2005).
Since ER-β mRNA was not significantly changed
in vehicle-injected castrated animals by 7 or 24 mg/kg 4-MBC, the
reduced repressive effect of E2 on AR cannot be ascribed
to changes ER-β (Weihua
et al. 2002). Sensitivity to steroid hormones also depends on
availability of steroid receptor coregulators. 4-MBC–induced
changes of coactivator SRC-1 levels in uterus (Durrer et al.
2005) prompted us to investigate nuclear receptor coregulator
expression in prostate. In addition to the coactivator SRC-1
(McKenna and O'Malley 2002), the corepressor N-CoR was
studied because effects of hydroxytamoxifen (Lavinsky et al.
1998; Shang et al. 2000) suggested the possibility of effects
of 4-MBC, which shows partial ER agonist characteristics
(Schlumpf et al. 2001a). The 4-MBC–induced
down-regulation of N-CoR protein might explain reduced gene repression
by E2, which recruits N-CoR (Stossi et al. 2006), but N-CoR
levels in castrated rats could not be determined because the
small amount of ventral prostate homogenate allowed only mRNA
analyses. Reduced baseline AR levels in presence of reduced
sensitivity to E2 and N-CoR levels indicate that the chronic
condition probably resulted from a combination of multiple
developmental and adult processes (Weihua et al. 2001; Woodham
et al. 2003).
Our data demonstrate that N-CoR is a
target of endocrine disruptors. N-CoR protein is reduced by
acute administration of E2 in MCF-7 cells (Frasor et al. 2005) and by
chronic hydroxytamoxifen in a mouse tumor model (Lavinsky et al.
1998). The effect of E2 was attributed to up-regulation of ubiquitin
ligase and targeting of N-CoR for proteasomal degradation.
Down-regulation of N-CoR may have implications for gene
expression on a broad scale because N-CoR is recruited by many
transcription factors, it also interacts with AR (Cheng S et al.
2002; Hodgson et al. 2005). Changes in N-CoR levels may be
relevant for prostate ontogeny and adult function.
In conclusion, our data indicate that
pre- and postnatal exposure of rats to 4-MBC interferes with
male sexual development. Classical end points showed a lowest
observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of 7 mg/kg and a NOAEL
of
0.7 mg/kg; molecular end points (N-CoR) a LOAEL of 0.7 mg/kg.
These doses are 30 and 3 times above an estimated human
exposure level of 0.23 mg/kg (Scientific Committee on Cosmetic
Products and Non-Food Products 1998). Thus, the margin of
safety (MOS = NOAEL/exposure x 100) may not be reached. However,
we think that risk considerations should be based on a comparison
of
internal exposure levels in humans and experimental animals.
Adipose tissue levels of 4-MBC in adult rat offspring were 449
ng/g
lipid at 7 mg/kg (Schlumpf et al. 2004b), close to fish levels
(44–166 ng/g lipid, Balmer et al. 2005). To obtain
information on internal human exposure, a monitoring study on
human milk is presently being conducted. |
|
 |
References
Applied Biosystems. 2001. User Bulletin
#2. Available: http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/ [accessed 17
July 2007].
Asano K, Maruyama S, Usui
T, Fujimoto N. 2003. Regulation of estrogen receptor α and
β expression
by testosterone in the rat prostate gland. Endocr J 50:
281–287.
Atanassova N., McKinnell
C, Turner KJ, Walker M, Fisher JS, Morley M, et al. 2000. Comparative
effects
of neonatal exposure of male rats to potent and weak
(environmental) estrogens on spermatogenesis at puberty and the
relationship to adult testis size and fertility: evidence for
stimulatory effects of low estrogen levels. Endocrinology 141:
3898–3907.
Bacher M, Rausch U, Goebel
HW, Polzar B, Mannherz HG, Aumuller G. 1993. Stromal and epithelial
cells
from rat ventral prostate during androgen deprivation and
estrogen treatment—regulation of transcription. Exp Clin
Endocrinol 101:78–86.
Balmer ME, Buser HR, Muller
MD, Poiger T. 2005. Occurrence of some organic UV filters in
wastewater, in
surface waters, and in fish from Swiss Lakes. Environ Sci
Technol 39:953–962
Biegel
LB, Flaws JA, Hirshfield AN, O'Connor JC, Elliott GS, Ladics
GS, et al. 1998. 90-day feeding and one-generation reproduction
study in Crl:CD BR rats
with 17β-estradiol. Toxicol Sci 44:116–142.
Cheng G, Weihua Z, Makinen
S, Makela S, Saji S, Warner M, et al. 2002. A role for the androgen
receptor
in follicular atresia of estrogen receptor β knockout mouse
ovary. Biol Reprod 66:77–84.
Cheng S, Brzostek S, Lee
SR, Hollenberg AN, Balk SP. 2002. Inhibition of the
dihydrotestosterone-activated androgen receptor by nuclear
receptor corepressor. Mol Endocrinol 16:1492–1501.
Durrer S. 2004. Developmental Toxicity of
4-methylbenzylidene Camphor and Different Endocrine Active
Chemicals: Steroid Hormone-Regulated Gene Expression in
Reproductive Organs of Rats [PhD Thesis no. 15544]. Zurich:
Swiss Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH).
Durrer S, Maerkel K, Schlumpf
M, Lichtensteiger W. 2005. Estrogen target gene regulation and
coactivator expression in rat uterus after developmental
exposure to the ultraviolet filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor.
Endocrinology 146:2130–2139.
Fan M, Nakshatri H, Nephew
KP. 2004. Inhibiting proteasomal proteolysis sustains estrogen
receptor-α activation. Mol Endocrinol 18:2603–2615.
Frasor J, Danes JM, Funk
CC, Katzenellenbogen BS. 2005. Estrogen down-regulation of the
corepressor N-CoR: mechanism and implications for estrogen
derepression of N-CoR-regulated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
102:13153–13157.
Fritz WA, Wang J, Eltoum
IE, Lamartiniere CA .2002. Dietary genistein down-regulates androgen
and
estrogen receptor expression in the rat prostate. Mol Cell
Endocrinol 186:89–99.
Gupta C. 2000. The role
of estrogen receptor, androgen receptor and growth factors in
diethylstilbestrol-induced programming of prostate
differentiation. Urol Res 28:223–229.
Hayden CGJ, Roberts MS,
Benson HAE. 1997. Systemic absorption of sunscreen after topical
application.
Lancet 350:863–864
Hodgson MC, Astapova I,
Cheng S, Lee LJ, Verhoeven MC, Choi E, et al. 2005. The androgen
receptor
recruits nuclear receptor CoRepressor (N-CoR) in the presence
of mifepristone via its N and C termini revealing a novel
molecular mechanism for androgen receptor antagonists. J Biol
Chem 280: 6511–6519.
Holbech H, Norum U, Korsgaard B,
Bjerregard P. 2002. The chemical UV-filter 3-benzylidene
camphor causes an oestrogenic effect in in vivo fish assay.
Pharmacol Toxicol 91:204–208.
Huynh H, Alpert I, Alaoui-Jamali
MA, Ng CY, Chan TWM. 2001. Co-administration of finasteride and
the
pure anti-oestrogen ICI 182,780 act synergistically in
modulating the IGF system in rat prostate. J Endocrinol 171:
109–118.
Inui M, Adachi T, Takenaka S, Inui H,
Nakazawa M, Ueda M, et al. 2003. Effect of UV screens and
preservatives on vitellogenin and choriogenin production in
male medaka (Oryzias latipes). Toxicology 194:43–50.
Janjua NR, Mogensen B,
Andersson AM, Petersen JH, Henriksen M, Skakkebaek NE, et al.
2004. Systemic
absorption of the sunscreens benzophenone-3,
octyl-methoxycinnamate, and 3-(4-methyl-benzylidene) camphor
after whole body topical application and reproductive hormone
levels in humans. J Invest Dermatol 123:57–61.
Kawamura Y, Ogawa Y, Nishimura
T, Kikuchi Y, Nishikawa J, Nishihara T, et al. 2003. Estrogenic
activities
of UV stabilizers used in food contact plastics and
benzophenone derivatives tested by the yeast two-hybrid assay.
J Health Sci 49:205–212.
Laios I, Journe F, Laurent
G, Nonclercq D, Toillon R-A, Seo H-S, et al. 2003. Mechanisms
governing the
accumulation of estrogen receptor α in MCF-7 breast cancer
cells treated with hydroxytamoxifen and related antiestrogens.
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol Biol 87:207–221.
Lau KM, Leav I, Ho SM.
1998. Rat estrogen receptor-α and -β, and progesterone
receptor mRNA
expression in various prostatic lobes and microdissected normal
and dysplastic epithelial tissues of the Noble rats.
Endocrinology 139:424–427.
Lavinsky RM, Jepsen K,
Heinzel T, Torchia J, Mullen TM, Schiff R, et al. 1998. Diverse
signaling pathways
modulate nuclear receptor recruitment of N-CoR and SMRT
complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2920–2925.
Ma R, Cotton B, Lichtensteiger
W, Schlumpf M. 2003. UV filters with antagonistic action at androgen
receptors in the MDA-kb2 cell transcriptional-activation assay.
Toxicol Sci 74:43–50.
Maerkel K, Durrer S, Henseler
M, Schlumpf M, Lichtensteiger W. 2007. Sexually dimorphic gene
regulation
in brain as a target for endocrine disrupters: developmental
exposure of rats to 4-methylbenzylidene camphor. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol 218: 152–165.
Maerkel K, Lichtensteiger
W, Durrer S, Conscience M, Schlumpf M. 2005. Sex- and region-specific
alterations of progesterone receptor mRNA levels and estrogen
sensitivity in rat brain following developmental exposure to
the estrogenic UV filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor. Environ
Toxicol Pharmacol 19:761–765.
Masutomi N, Shibutani M,
Takagi H, Uneyama C, Takahashi N, Hirose M. 2003. Impact of dietary
exposure to
methoxychlor, genistein, or diisononyl phthalate during the
perinatal period on the development of the rat
endocrine/reproductive systems in later life. Toxicology 192:
149–170.
McKenna NJ, O'Malley BW. 2002.
Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors
and coregulators. Cell 108:465–474.
Mueller SO, Kling M, Firzani PA, Mecky A,
Duranti E, Shields-Botella J, et al. 2003. Activation of
estrogen receptor α and Erβ by 4-methylbenzylidene—camphor in
human and rat cells: comparison with phyto- and xenoestrogens.
Toxicol Lett 142:89–101.
Nagel SC, vom Saal FS,
Thayer KA, Dhar MG, Boechler M, Welshons WV. 1997. Relative binding
affinity-serum
modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo
bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol.
Environ Health Perspect 105:70–76.
Nagtegaal M, Ternes TA,
Baumann W, Nagel R. 1997. UV-Filtersubstanzen in Wasser und Fischen.
UWSF-Z
Umweltchem Ökotox 9:79–86.
Naslund MJ, Coffey DS.
1986. The differential effects of neonatal androgen, estrogen
and
progesterone on adult rat prostate growth. J Urol 136:
1136–1140.
Nellemann C, Dalgaard M,
Holst B, Bonefeld-Jrgensen EC, Vinggaard AM. 2005. Gene expression
changes in rat prostate after activation or blocking of the
androgen and estrogen receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 237:
25–35.
Nickerson T, Miyake H,
Gleave ME, Pollak M. 1999. Castration-induced apoptosis of androgen-dependent
shionogi carcinoma is associated with increased expression of
genes encoding insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins.
Cancer Res 59:3392–3395.
Omoto Y, Imamov O, Warner M, Gustafsson
J-A. 2005. Estrogen receptor α and imprinting of the neonatal mouse
ventral prostate by estrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:
1484–1489.
Plagellat C, Kupper T,
Furrer R, de Alencastro LF, Grandjean D, Taradellas J. 2006.
Concentrations
and specific loads of UV filters in sewage sludge originating
from a monitoring network in Switzerland. Chemosphere 62:
915–925
Poiger T, Buser HR, Balmer
ME, Bergqvist PA, Muller MD. 2004. Occurrence of UV filter compounds
from
sunscreens in surface waters: regional mass balance in two
Swiss lakes. Chemosphere 55:951–963.
Prins GS. 1992. Neonatal
estrogen exposure induces lobe-specific alterations in adult
rat prostate
androgen receptor expression. Endocrinology 130:
3703–3714.
Prins GS, Birch L. 1995.
The developmental pattern of androgen receptor expression in
rat prostate lobes
is altered after neonatal exposure to estrogen. Endocrinology
136: 1303–1314.
Prins GS, Marmer M, Woodham
C, Chang W, Kuiper G, Gustafsson JA, et al. 1998. Estrogen receptor-β
messenger ribonucleic acid ontogeny in the prostate of normal
and neonatally estrogenized rats. Endocrinology 139:
874–883.
Putz O, Schwartz CB, Kim
S, LeBlanc GA, Cooper RL, Prins GS. 2001a. Neonatal low- and
high-dose
exposure to estradiol benzoate in the male rat: I. Effects on
the prostate gland. Biol Reprod 65:1496–1505.
Putz O, Schwartz CB, LeBlanc
GA, Cooper RL, Prins GS. 2001b. Neonatal low- and high-dose exposure
to
estradiol benzoate in the male rat: II. Effects on male puberty
and the reproductive tract. Biol Reprod 65:1506–1517.
Rajfer J, Coffey DS. 1978.
Sex steroid imprinting of the immature prostate. Long-term effects.
Invest
Urol 16:186–190.
Schlumpf M, Berger L, Cotton
B, Conscience-Egli M, Durrer S, Fleischmann J, et al. 2001b.
Estrogen active UV screens SÖFW-Journal 127:10–15.
Schlumpf M, Cotton B, Conscience M, Haller
V, Steinmann B, Lichtensteiger W. 2001a. In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity
of UV screens. Environ Health Perspect 109:239–244.
Schlumpf M, Jarry H, Wuttke
W, Ma R, Lichtensteiger W. 2004a. Estrogenic activity and estrogen
receptor β binding of the UV filter 3-benzylidene camphor.
Comparison with 4-methylbenzylidene camphor. Toxicology 199:
109–20
Schlumpf M, Schmid P, Durrer
S, Conscience M, Maerkel K, Henseler M, et al. 2004b. Endocrine
activity and
developmental toxicity of cosmetic UV filters-an update.
Toxicology 205:113–122
Schmutzler C, Hamann I,
Hoffmann PJ, Kovacs G, Stemmler L, Mentrup B, et al. 2004. Endocrine
active
compounds affect thyrotropin and thyroid hormone levels in
serum as well as endpoints of thyroid hormone action in liver,
heart and kidney. Toxicology 205:95–112
Schreurs R, Lauser P, Seinen
W, van den Burg B. 2002. Estrogenic activity of UV filters determined
by
an in vitro reporter gene assay and an in vivo transgenic
zebrafish assay. Arch Toxicol 76:257–261.
Scientific Committee on
Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products. 1998. Opinion of the
Scientific
Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended
for consumers, concerning 3-(4´-methylbenzylidene)-d,l-camphor
(Colipa no. S60), adopted by the plenary session of the SCCNFP
of 21 January 1998 (XXIV/1377/96, rev. 1/98). European
Commission, DG Health and Consumer Protection, Public Health,
Risk Assessment, Opinions.
Shang Y, Hu X, DiRenzo
J, Lazar MA, Brown M. 2000. Cofactor dynamics and sufficiency
in estrogen
receptor-regulated transcription. Cell 103:843–852.
Stossi F, Likhite VS, Katzenellenbogen
JA, Katzenellenbogen BS. 2006. Estrogen-occupied estrogen receptor
represses cyclin G2 gene expression and recruits a repressor
complex at the cyclin G2 promoter. J Biol Chem 281:
16272–16278.
Takagi H, Shibutani M,
Masutomi N, Uneyama C, Takahashi N, Mitsumori K, et al. 2004.
Lack of maternal
dietary exposure effects of bisphenol A and nonylphenol during
the critical period of brain sexual differentiation on the
reproductive/ endocrine systems in later life. Arch Toxicol 78:
97–105.
Timms BG, Petersen SL,
vom Saal FS. 1999. Prostate gland growth during development is
stimulated in both
male and female rat fetuses by intrauterine proximity to female
fetuses. J Urol 161:1694–1701.
Tinwell H, Lefevre PA,
Moffat GJ, Burns A, Odum J, Spurway TD, et al. 2002. Confirmation
of uterotrophic
activity of 3- (4–methylbenzylidene) camphor in the
immature rat. Environ Health Perspect 110:533–536.
Torring N, Vinter-Jensen
L, Pedersen SB, Sorensen FB, Flyvbjerg A, Nexo E. 1997. Systemic
administration
of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) causes growth of the
rat prostate. J Urol 158:222–227.
Vom Saal FS, Timms BG,
Montano MN, Palanza P, Thayer P, Nagel SC, et al. 1997. Prostate
enlargement in
mice due to fetal exposure to low doses of estradiol and
diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2056–2051
Weihua Z, Lathe R, Warner
M, Gustafsson JA. 2002. An endocrine pathway in the prostate,
ERβ, AR,
5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol, and CYP7B1, regulates
prostate growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:13589–13594.
Weihua Z, Makela S, Andersson
LC, Salmi S, Saji S, Webster JI, et al. 2001. A role for estrogen
receptor
β in the regulation of growth of the ventral prostate. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6330–6335.
Wisniewski AB, Klein SL,
Lakshmanan Y, Gearhart JP. 2003. Exposure to genistein during
gestation and
lactation demasculinizes the reproductive system in rats. J
Urol 169: 1582–1586.
Woodham C, Birch L, Prins
GS. 2003. Neonatal estrogen down-regulates prostatic androgen
receptor
through a proteosome-mediated protein degradation pathway.
Endocrinology 144:4841–4850. |
|
 |
|
| |