
| |  | |  |
Article
|
| Toxicogenomics of Subchronic Hexachlorobenzene Exposure in Brown Norway Rats Janine Ezendam,1,2,3 Frank Staedtler,4 Jeroen Pennings,2 Rob
J. Vandebriel,2 Raymond Pieters,1
Johannes H. Harleman,5 and Joseph G. Vos2,3 1Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Immunotoxicology,
Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 2Laboratory for Toxicology,
Pathology and Genetics, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment,
Bilthoven, the Netherlands; 3Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department
of Pathobiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 4Biomarker
Development and 5Preclinical Safety, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel,
Switzerland Abstract Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) is a persistent environmental pollutant with toxic effects in man and rat. Reported adverse effects are hepatic porphyria, neurotoxicity, and adverse effects on the reproductive and immune system. To obtain more insight into HCB-induced mechanisms of toxicity, we studied gene expression levels using DNA microarrays. For 4 weeks, Brown Norway rats were fed a diet supplemented with 0, 150, or 450 mg HCB/kg. Spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) , thymus, blood, liver, and kidney were collected and analyzed using the Affymetrix rat RGU-34A GeneChip microarray. Most significant (p < 0.001) changes, compared to the control group, occurred in spleen, followed by liver, kidney, blood, and MLN, but only a few genes were affected in thymus. This was to be expected, as the thymus is not a target organ of HCB. Transcriptome profiles confirmed known effects of HCB such as stimulatory effects on the immune system and induction of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, porphyria, and the reproductive system. In line with previous histopathological findings were increased transcript levels of markers for granulocytes and macrophages. New findings include the upregulation of genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines, antioxidants, acute phase proteins, mast cell markers, complements, chemokines, and cell adhesion molecules. Generally, gene expression data provide evidence that HCB induces a systemic inflammatory response, accompanied by oxidative stress and an acute phase response. In conclusion, this study confirms previously observed (immuno) toxicological effects of HCB but also reveals several new and mechanistically relevant gene products. Thus, transcriptome profiles can be used as markers for several of the processes that occur after HCB exposure. Key words: Brown Norway rat, DNA microarray analysis, drug metabolism, estrogen metabolism, genomics, hexachlorobenzene, immunotoxicity, inflammation, oxidative stress, porphyria. Environ Health Perspect 112:782-791 (2004) . doi:10.1289/txg.6861 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 7 April 2004] Address correspondence to J. Ezendam, IRAS, Yalelaan 2, 3584 CM, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Telephone: 0031 302535328. Fax: 0031 302535077. E-mail: j.ezendam@iras.uu.nl We thank S. Bongiovanni, M. Goetschy, S. Laurent, and N. Hartmann (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) for performing the DNA microarray experiments. We thank M. de Baets (Department of Neurology, Academic Hospital of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands) for performing the radioimmunoassay to determine antiacetylcholine receptor antibodies, and we thank B. Baumann (RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands) for measuring the dioxin-like contamination of HCB. The authors declare they have no competing financial interests. Received 13 November 2003 ; accepted 7 April 2004. |
|
|
 |
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) was used as a fungicide until the 1970s, when such
use was prohibited. Considerable amounts are still generated as waste by-products
of industrial processes and emitted into the environment. Because of its chemical
stability, persistence, and long-range transport, HCB can be found throughout
the environment and is detectable in human milk, blood, and adipose tissue.
In the 1950s, an accidental poisoning in Turkey revealed several toxic effects
of HCB in humans. Approximately 3,000-5,000 people ingested HCB-treated
seed grain and developed a disease called porphyria turcica (Gocmen et al.
1986), characterized by hepatic porphyria and cutaneous skin lesions caused
by a disturbed porphyrin metabolism (Bickers 1987). Other clinical symptoms
include enlarged liver, spleen, lymph nodes (LNs), and thyroid, neurological
symptoms, and arthritis. Infants born to mothers exposed to HCB developed a
different syndrome called pembe yara, characterized by high mortality, diarrhea,
fever, hepatomegaly, and skin lesions in the absence of porphyria, but with
infiltrations of macrophages and lymphocytes and infiltrates in the lung (Cam
1960). Immunotoxic effects were reported in the Turkish poisoning victims,
but also in occupationally exposed workers in Brazil. Increased levels of IgM
and IgG were observed, as well as impaired function of neutrophil granulocytes
(Queiroz et al. 1998a, 1998b).
In rats HCB induced hepatic porphyria and neurotoxic effects (Courtney 1979),
and toxic effects on the reproductive system (Jarrell et al. 1998), thyroid
function (Kleiman de Pisarev et al. 1990), and immune system (Michielsen et
al. 1999; Vos 1986). Because HCB is a lipophilic xenobiotic, exposure leads
to accumulation in adipose tissue, whereas only a small part of ingested HCB
is metabolized. HCB can be converted in a cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent manner
(Van Ommen and Van Bladeren 1989) and also via the mercapturic acid pathway
(Renner 1981).
Brown Norway (BN) rats are very susceptible to HCB-induced adverse immune
effects. Exposure caused a dose-dependent immunostimulation characterized by
enlarged spleen and LNs and increased serum levels of total IgM, IgG, IgE,
and IgM against single-stranded (ss)DNA. Furthermore, rats developed inflammatory
skin and lung effects characterized by infiltrates of eosinophilic granulocytes
and macrophages (Michielsen et al. 1997, 1999). Although both T cells and macrophages
seem to play an important role in HCB-induced immunotoxicity in BN rats (Ezendam
et al. 2004), exact mechanisms are unknown.
In this study we used DNA microarray analysis to assess changes associated
with HCB exposure at the gene expression level. Transcript levels were measured
using the Affymetrix RG U34A GeneChip. BN rats were exposed to 0, 150, or 450
mg HCB per kg diet, doses used also in earlier studies (Ezendam et al. 2004;
Michielsen et al. 1997), and gene expression levels were assessed in spleen,
mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), thymus, blood, liver, and kidney. This approach
revealed several changes in line with the known toxic effects but also revealed
novel ones, which may suggest additional (immuno)toxic effects of HCB exposure
and/or provide more insight into the mechanisms of HCB-induced adverse effects.
Materials and Methods
Rats and Maintenance
Three-week-old SPF female inbred Brown Norway (BN/SsNOlaHsD, termed BN) rats
were purchased from Harlan (Blackthorn, UK). Rats were acclimatized for 1 week
before the start of the experiment. They were kept two by two under standard
conditions with food and acidified drinking water ad libitum. The diet
consisted of a semisynthetic diet (SSP/TOX; Hope Farms, Woerden, the Netherlands)
with or without crystalline HCB (99% purity; Aldrich Chemie, Bornem, Belgium)
by mixing of homogeneity. The experiments were approved by the animal experiments
committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the Utrecht University.
Experimental Protocol
Rats were randomly assigned to different experimental groups (n =
6) receiving either control diet or the diet supplemented with 150 mg (low
dose) or 450 mg (high dose) HCB/kg. Body weight (bw) and skin lesions were
recorded twice per week. After 28 days rats were killed by CO2/O2.
Blood was collected in tubes containing EDTA to prevent clotting and transferred
into Fastubes (Endotell, Allschwill, Switzerland) containing guanidinium isothiocyanate
in 0.9% NaCl solution. Tubes were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Spleen, MLN,
thymus (freed from adjacent LN), liver, and kidney were collected, weighed,
and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
In additional experiments for pathology, blood, and serum analysis, rats
were exposed to the same dosing regimens. Rats were killed by a lethal dose
of pentobarbital (Euthesate; 0.3 g/kg bw ip; Ceva Sante Animal B.V., Maassluis,
the Netherlands). One part of the blood was collected in EDTA tubes for total
and differential leukocyte counts; the other part was used for serum analysis.
Spleen, MLN, thymus, liver, and kidney were fixed in phosphate-buffered 4%
formaldehyde; after embedding in Paraplast, 5-µm sections were stained
with hematoxylin and eosin.
DNA microarray experiment. Total RNA was obtained by acid guanidinium
isothiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction (Trizol; Invitrogen Life
Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA) (Chomczynski and Sacchi 1987) and purified
on an affinity resin (RNeasy; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer
instructions. DNA microarray experiments were conducted as recommended by the
manufacturer of the GeneChip system (Affymetrix, Inc. 2002) and as previously
described (Lockhart et al. 1996). Rat specific RG U34A gene expression probe
arrays (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used containing 8,799
probe sets interrogating primarily annotated genes. Per tissue and per animal,
one chip was used. The resulting image files (.dat files) were processed using
the Microarray Analysis Suite 5 (MAS5) software (Affymetrix, Inc.). Tab-delimited
files were obtained containing data regarding signal intensity (Signal) and
categorical expression level measurement (Absolute Call).
Data Analysis
To determine which genes were diffentially expressed between the three treatment
groups, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to genes that had
a present call in at least one of the samples. Genes with a p-value < 0.001
were considered statistically significant. Group average fold changes were
calculated by using the average of the low- or high-dose groups compared with
the control group. The annotation of the genes was determined by using NetAffx
(http://www.affymetrix.com; Liu et al. 2003). Further information on probe
sets was found in the literature or in the KEGG database (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/kegg2.html).
Additional data analysis by principal component analysis (PCA) was performed
using GeneMaths (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Averages of gene
expression levels in control, low-, and high-dose groups were calculated; low
values were cut off using a lower threshold of 10, and the values were log
transformed before PCA.
GC-MS Analysis of
Contamination in the Hexachlorobenzene Sample
To analyze HCB for contaminating polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
(PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), a solution of acetone containing 13C12-labeled
internal quantitation standards (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Woburn, MA,
USA) of the PCDDs and PCDFs was added to dichloromethane. The solution was
brought to a Carbosphere (Alltech B.V., Zaandam, the Netherlands) column, then
purified on Al2O3, evaporated to dryness, and redissolved
in toluene. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses
were performed on a double-focusing mass spectrometer coupled to a gas chromatograph.
GC separations were carried out on a nonpolar capillary column (60 m DB-5MS;
0.25 mm ID, 0.10-µm film thickness; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA).
Ionization of the sample was performed in the electron impact mode. Detection
was performed by selected ion recording.
Results and Discussion
Body Weight Gain, Macroscopic Skin Lesions, and Organ Weights
During treatment with the low-dose diet, body weight increased significantly
from day 10 onward, whereas rats exposed to the high-dose diet had a significantly
higher body weight on days 10 and 20 (data not shown). One of the rats in the
high-dose group died after 25 days of exposure to HCB. Time of onset, severity,
and size of the skin lesions were similar as described previously (Michielsen
et al. 1997). Increased liver and spleen weights in both dosing groups were
also in accordance with previous work, as were the observed histopathological
changes in these organs (Michielsen et al. 1997). In the high-dose group, kidney
weight increased significantly, as observed before in Wistar rats treated with
HCB for 25 days (Kennedy and Wigfield 1990) but not in BN rats treated with
HCB for 21 days (Michielsen et al. 2002). Histopathological changes were not
observed. Thymus weight decreased significantly in the high-dose group. It
is likely that this thymus atrophy is caused by stress, as typical stress-induced
alterations (Kuper et al. 2002) were observed. No significant differences in
MLN weight were found, but histopathology of MLN of the high-dose group showed
comparable morphology as reported previously (Michielsen et al. 1997).
DNA Microarray Analysis
|
Figure 1. PCA plot of the ratios of low dose versus
control (blue circles) or high dose versus control (red circles).
|
Table 1.

|
Table 2.

|
Table 3.

|
Table 4.

|
Table 5.

|
| Table 6.

|
Table 7.

|
|
Figure 2. Hypothetical overview of cells and factors involved
in the inflammatory response initiated by HCB. Assuming that HCB activates
macrophages, this would lead to a cascade of reactions, activating immune cells and pro-
and anti-inflammatory (in red) mediators, eventually leading to inflammation.
|
Table 8.

|
The PCA plot (Figure 1) of the ratios of the low- and high-dose groups over
the control group shows that gene expression in spleen, blood, and liver is
dose dependently changed, whereas this is less clear for MLN, thymus, and kidney.
Spleen and blood cluster close together, as do kidney and thymus, but liver
and MLN are more distant from those tissues. Most significant changes (p < 0.001)
in gene expression occurred in spleen (679 probe sets), followed by liver (346),
kidney (232), blood (144), MLN (104), and thymus (28). The low number of changes
in thymus is not surprising, as the thymus is not a target organ of HCB. Remarkably
in kidney, many genes were affected, although this organ has rarely been described
to be affected by HCB. Furthermore, although organ weights were increased,
no histopathological changes were detected in the present study. Because not
all significantly changed genes can be included in this article, we present
only genes associated with immunology (Tables 1-6), acute phase responses
(APRs) and oxidative stress (Table 7), and enzymes involved in drug metabolism,
porphyria, and estrogen metabolism (Table 8).
Figure 2 shows a deduced scheme of immune cells and mediators involved in
the inflammatory response. This scheme is used to simplify the cascade of reactions
that occur during inflammation and to present the results in a logical order.
The complete list of significantly changed probe sets can be found on the ArrayExpress
website (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/
arrayexpress).
Inflammatory Response
Macrophages. In HCB-exposed rats, macrophage infiltrations
were observed in skin, lung (Michielsen et al. 1997), spleen (Ezendam et al.
2004; Schielen et al. 1993), and liver (Courtney 1979). As expected, HCB increased
gene expression of macrophage markers in spleen and MLN and Kupffer cell markers
in liver, supporting the significance of macrophages in HCB-induced immunotoxicity.
Proinflammatory cytokines. Gene expression of the receptor
for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and
TNFß (TNF receptor superfamily,
member 1) in MLN, spleen, and kidney was increased. In addition, IL-6 gene
expression was affected in MLN, just as the IL-6 signal transducer in kidney.
IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays an important role in B-cell differentiation,
growth of T cells, and differentiation of macrophages (Naka et al. 2002). HCB
also induced gene expression of IL-1ß in spleen (low-dose group) and
IL-1ß-converting enzyme in kidney, an enzyme that converts IL-1ß and
IL-18 to their active form. Gene expression of IL-18, a cytokine produced mainly
by Kupffer cells, was elevated in liver.
p38 MAPK signaling pathway. The mitogen-activated protein kinase
(MAPK) family consists of signal transduction molecules important during inflammation.
HCB induced expression of p38 MAPK and other MAPKs in kidney. Activation of
p38 MAPK leads to phosphorylation of several transcription factors, such as
signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT-1). Gene expression
of STAT-1 was increased in liver. Both MAPK and STAT-1 are important in cytokine
production, and negative regulation of cytokine signaling occurs at the level
of transcription of these molecules. Proteins involved in suppression of cytokine
production are the so-called suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCSs). HCB
exposure increased gene expression of several of these proteins, probably to
counteract the high cytokine levels. In spleen, SOCS-2 was upregulated in the
low-dose group, but downregulated in the high-dose group, and SOCS-3 was upregulated
in MLN. In the thymus, cytokine inducible SH2-containing protein was upregulated,
a protein that plays a critical role in controlling T-cell activation (Chen
et al. 2003).
Oxidative stress and antioxidants. Previous studies have shown
that HCB exposure induced oxidative stress (Billi de Catabbi et al. 1997) and
increased expression of antioxidants in the liver (Stonard et al. 1998). The
present work confirms these findings, as several antioxidants were induced
in liver. Transcriptome profiles show that antioxidants are also increased
in spleen, MLN, blood, and kidney. The infiltrated macrophages and granulocytes
probably generate these reactive oxygen species (ROS). Additional experiments
showed that serum hydroperoxides were significantly increased in HCB-exposed
BN rats (data not shown). Excessive presence of ROS can activate nuclear factor
kappa B, an important factor in regulating the inflammatory response (Schreck
et al. 1992). In addition, ROS can cause cell damage, providing danger signals
that can attract inflammatory cells. Therefore, increased oxidative stress
induced by HCB may play a pivotal role in the observed immunostimulation.
Acute phase response. Acute phase proteins (APPs) are important
in inflammatory responses. HCB increased gene expression of several APPS, such
as heat shock proteins (HSPs) in spleen and MLN. HSPs protect cells against
cellular stress. HCB also increased gene expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9
(MMP-9) in spleen and of the natural inhibitors of MMPs, tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) in liver and TIMP-2 in MLN. MMPs play an important
role in the cleavage of membrane components, enabling leukocytes to extravasate
the blood. HCB also affected transcript levels of other APPs, such as haptoglobin
(a hemoglobin scavenger), lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, orosomucoid (important
in immunomodulation), and metallothionein and ceruloplasmin (antioxidants).
Negative APPs (transferrin and its receptor) were also induced; these proteins
are normally downregulated during an APR. Synthesis of these APPs, however,
is also dependent on iron metabolism. HCB induced iron accumulation in the
liver (Stonard et al. 1998). The upregulation of transferrin gene expression
in spleen and kidney suggests that this is also the case in these organs.
Complement system. Complement components are also important
in inflammatory responses. HCB increased gene expression of several components
of the complement pathway in spleen, blood, kidney, and liver.
Mast cells. HCB enhanced gene expression of mast cell enzymes,
probably a consequence of complement activation. This finding may also be explained
by a characteristic of the BN rat, a strain that tends to respond in a more
T helper-2-skewed fashion. Basal levels of serum IgE are high, and HCB
increases IgE levels even more (Michielsen et al. 1997). Loading of mast cells
with IgE may result in degranulation and release of inflammatory mediators.
Chemokines and chemokine receptors. In all analyzed organs,
HCB increased gene expression of chemokines, important mediators in the recruitment
of leukocytes from the circulation. HCB induced gene expression of several
CXC chemokines and their receptors: lipopolysaccharide-induced CXC chemokine
(LIX), chemokine (CXC motif) ligand 10, growth-related oncogene (Gro)
and the CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2). LIX is a potent neutrophil chemoattractant,
whereas chemokine (CXC motif) ligand 10 plays an important role in chemotaxis
of activated T cells and monocytes. Gro is a ligand that binds to CXCR2, a
receptor present on neutrophils. HCB induced gene expression of two CC chemokine
receptors: CC chemokine-binding receptor JAB61, a receptor that binds
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and -3, and the receptor for macrophage
inflammatory protein-1 that
is present on neutrophils and eosinophils (Mantovani et al. 1998).
Cell adhesion molecules. Chemokines induce expression of cell
adhesion molecules on both endothelial cells and leukocytes. HCB affected gene
expression of cell adhesion molecules in all organs except the thymus. Intercellular
adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and selectin are endothelial
cell adhesion molecules that recognize receptors on hemopoietic cells. Other
cell adhesion molecules in which gene expression was induced by HCB were fibronectin-1,
embigin, CD36, and glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1 (GlyCAM-1).
The latter is expressed only on high endothelial venules (HEVs) in LNs. Previous
reports have shown that HCB increased the development of HEVs in LNs (Michielsen
et al. 1997), which probably results in increased GlyCAM-1 mRNA expression.
Granulocytes. Upregulation of chemokines and cell adhesion
molecules leads to influx of leukocytes. Data obtained in this study confirm
increased numbers of monocytes and neutrophilic granulocytes in blood (unpublished
data) and cellular infiltrations in spleen of BN rats (Michielsen et al. 1999).
In all analyzed organs and blood, gene expressions for S100 calcium-binding
protein A8 (MRP-8) and A9 (MRP-14) were upregulated. These proteins are abundantly
present in the cytoplasm of neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages (Roth et
al. 2003). Other markers associated with granulocytes and macrophages that
were affected by HCB were defensin (neutrophils and macrophages), lipocalin
(granulocytes), and CD24 (granulocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes). HCB also
induced gene expression of 12-lipoxygenase- and arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating
protein, both involved in leukotriene activation, which takes place in myeloid
cells (Bigby 2002). Gene expression of Fc receptors was also elevated by HCB,
probably because of the increase in the number of cells bearing this receptor.
The same is true for the upregulation of gene expression of several pattern
recognition molecules, such as CD14, mannose-binding lectin, and peptidoglycan
recognition molecules, present on monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils.
This work indicates that HCB exposure results in a systemic inflammatory
response. To counterbalance this response, the immune system produces anti-inflammatory
mediators. HCB exposure induced gene expression of one of these mediators,
annexin-1, which blocks leukocyte migration and induces apoptosis in inflammatory
cells (Perretti and Gavins 2003).
T and B Cells and Major Histocompatibility Complex II Expression
Gene expression of T-cell markers such as CD3 a subunit of the T-cell receptor,
was decreased in spleen, whereas in blood, HCB decreased gene expression for
CD3 and CD37, the latter being a B-cell marker. Furthermore, HCB increased
gene expression of CD52 or B7 antigen, a marker present on antigen-presenting
cells, such as B cells and monocytes. This is in line with previous studies
that have shown a stronger increase of monocytes and granulocytes in blood
after HCB exposure, resulting in relatively fewer lymphocytes (Schulte et al.
2002; Vos et al. 1979). In kidney we observed an increased expression of OX
45 (homolog to CD2), a membrane protein involved in the binding to LFA-3, important
in adhesion of T cells to other cell types and in T-cell activation. HCB enhanced
gene expression of immunoglobulins in spleen, MLN, liver, and kidney. This
is in line with the observed increase of serum levels of IgM, IgG, and IgE
in BN rats (Michielsen et al. 1997). Major histocompatibility complex (MHC)II
gene expression was decreased in spleen and blood and increased in liver and
kidney.
Autoantibodies
The anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody gene (rearranged Ig -2a chain)
was upregulated in spleen, thymus, liver, and kidney. These autoantibodies
are associated with the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis (MG), a neurological
disease characterized by degeneration of the acetylcholine receptor and resulting
in muscle weakness (De Baets and Stassen 2002). HCB-induced neurological effects,
however, are not the same as symptoms described for MG. Additional experiments
performed to detect antiacetylcholine receptors antibodies (total Ig) in serum
did not confirm gene expression data. HCB exposure also increased gene expression
of anti-nerve growth factor-30 antibodies in spleen and liver and downregulated
expression in blood. These antibodies belong to the naturally occurring autoantibodies
and are elevated in inflammatory diseases (Dicou et al. 1996). The exact role
of these autoantibodies is not yet known. Previously it was shown that HCB
increased IgM antibodies against autoantigens such as ssDNA (Michielsen et
al. 1997; Schielen et al. 1993). Expression of La (= autoantigen SS-B/La) was
induced in kidney. This protein plays a role in RNA polymerization and is often
a target of autoantibodies found in several autoimmune diseases (Huhn et al.
1997).
Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes
Cytochrome P450. CYP enzymes are involved in the oxidative
dehalogenation of HCB (Van Ommen and Van Bladeren 1989). HCB exposure increased
gene expression of several CYPs and of epoxide hydrolase, an enzyme involved
in detoxification of epoxides in liver (Table 8). In spleen, MLN and kidney
expression of CYP enzymes was also induced but to a lesser extent than in liver.
Role of dioxin-like contamination of HCB. Surprisingly, gene
expression of CYP1A1 was strongly upregulated in liver. This was an unexpected
finding, as previous work showed that HCB induced much more CYP2B than CYP1A1
(Franklin et al. 1997). CYP1A1 upregulation is associated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(TCDD) or related compounds that activate the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor.
It is still the subject of debate if HCB is a dioxin-like compound. Van Birgelen
(1998) suggested that HCB should be considered as one, as HCB meets the criteria
for dioxin-like compounds: the ability to bind to the Ah receptor, induction
of dioxin-like effects, and bioaccumulation. Vos (2000) commented, however,
that although TCDD and HCB share some target organs, the toxic effects in these
systems are quite different. Furthermore the affinity for the Ah receptor is
10,000 times less for HCB than for TCDD (Hahn et al. 1989). HCB was analyzed
to investigate whether contamination with dioxin-like compounds was responsible
for the observed effects. Indeed, HCB was contaminated with PCDDs and PCDFs,
and the toxic equivalent was 187 pg/mg HCB. The calculated no observed adverse
effect level (NOAEL) of CYP1A1 induction was 0.7-4 ng TCDD/kg bw/day (Van
Birgelen et al. 1995). In our study rats were exposed to approximately 2 ng/kg
bw/day (low dose) and 6 ng/kg bw/day (high dose). Therefore, exposure to dioxins
and furans is of the same order of magnitude as the calculated NOAEL and therefore
not likely to be responsible for the observed strong increase in gene expression
for CYP1A1. This is not in accordance with previous work showing that HCB could
only moderately or not at all induce CYP1A1 by HCB (Franklin et al. 1997; Machala
et al. 1996). This discrepancy may be explained by strain differences or by
the difference in detection of CYP1A1 (7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase
induction versus gene expression).
Mercapturic acid pathway. The BN rat degrades HCB also via
the mercapturic acid pathway that involves glutathione conjugation catalyzed
by glutathione S-transferase (GST; Renner 1981). As expected, gene expression
of several GSTs was upregulated in liver. Other phase II enzymes that were
induced are mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase, uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase,
and the sulfotransferase family.
Porphyria
One of the main toxic effects of HCB is the induction of porphyria in humans
(Gocmen et al. 1986) and experimental animals (Courtney 1979), caused by a
disturbance in heme biosynthesis. In the present study, gene expression of
enzymes involved in heme synthesis were induced. These include aminolevulinate
(ALA) dehydratase, porphobilinogen deaminase (hydroxymethylbilane synthase),
and uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase in spleen and ALA synthase in liver.
Estrogen/Androgen Metabolism
Several reports have shown that HCB exposure induces effects on the reproductive
system. In humans, serum HCB levels from women exposed during the accident
in Turkey correlated with spontaneous abortion (Jarrell et al. 1998), and the
proportion of male births was reduced in the group of women that had HCB-induced
porphyria (Jarrell et al. 2002). In monkeys, HCB decreased estrogen levels
(Foster et al. 1995), and in Wistar rats, HCB exposure reduced serum levels
of estrogen and decreased levels of uterine estrogen receptors (Alvarez et
al. 2000). Gene expression of estrogen sulfotransferase was upregulated in
liver. This enzyme is important in the sulfation of estrogen, a pathway that
inactivates estrogen. The enzyme 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
was downregulated in the liver. This enzyme catalyzes the interconversion of
testosterone and androstenedione as well as estradiol and estrone. Both can
lead to lower estrogen levels. Together, these results indicate that HCB interferes
with estrogen metabolism.
Conclusions
Gene expression profiles confirmed known effects of HCB such as stimulatory
effects on the immune system and induction of enzymes involved in drug metabolism,
porphyria, and the reproductive system. New findings include upregulation of
genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines, antioxidants, APPs, complement, mast
cell markers, chemokines, and cell adhesion molecules. Thus, most transcriptome
profiles are consistent with and complementary to previous pathological findings
and can be used as markers for several processes that occur after HCB exposure.
Presumably, after oral exposure to HCB, macrophages are attracted to organs
such as spleen, lung, and skin and become activated by HCB. This leads to a
cascade of reactions involving innate immune cells, as depicted in Figure 2.
The gene expression profiles provide evidence for the importance of macrophages
and granulocytes and mediators released by these cells in the adverse inflammatory
response against HCB. In this way, co-stimulatory or danger signals are generated
that could polyclonally activate T cells. Thus, DNA microarray analysis revealed
the complexity of cells and mediators involved in the immune response elicited
by HCB and confirms previous work showing the importance of macrophages and
granulocytes (Ezendam et al. 2004; Michielsen et al. 1999).
Data obtained in an extensive study such as this can be used to create a
database with gene expression profiles of known toxicants, as has been suggested
previously (Thomas et al. 2002). Chemicals can be screened by establishing
their gene expression profiles and comparing them with profiles of known toxic
chemicals. In this way classes of toxic compounds can be recognized, as has
previously been shown for hepatotoxicants (Hamadeh et al. 2002a, 2002b), and
genomics may be an additional tool in hazard identification. |
|
 |
| [References Listed in PubMed] References
Affymetrix, Inc. 2002. GeneChip Expression Analysis: Data Analysis Fundamentals.
Santa Clara, CA:Affymetrix, Inc. Available: http://www.affymetrix.com/support/downloads/manuals.pdf [accessed: 25 April 2004].
Alvarez L, Randi A, Alvarez P, Piroli G, Chamson-Reig A, Lux-Lantos V, et
al. 2000. Reproductive effects of hexachlorobenzene in female rats. J Appl
Toxicol 20:81-87.
Bickers DR. 1987. The dermatologic manifestations of human porphyria. Ann
NY Acad Sci 514:261-267.
Bigby TD. 2002. The yin and the yang of 5-lipoxygenase pathway activation.
Mol Pharmacol 62:200-202.
Billi de Catabbi S, Sterin-Speziale N, Fernandez MC, Minutolo C, Aldonatti
C, San Martin de Viale L. 1997. Time course of hexachlorobenzene-induced alterations
of lipid metabolism and their relation to porphyria. Int J Biochem Cell Biol
29:335-344.
Cam C. 1960. Une nouvelle dermatose épidémique des enfants.
Anales de Dermatologie 87:393-397.
Chen S, Anderson PO, Li L, Sjogren HO, Wang P, Li SL. 2003. Functional association
of cytokine-induced SH2 protein and protein kinase C in activated T cells.
Int Immunol 15:403-409.
Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. 1987. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid
guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156-159.
Courtney KD. 1979. Hexachlorobenzene (HCB): a review. Environ Res 20:225-266.
De Baets M, Stassen MH. 2002. The role of antibodies in myasthenia gravis.
J Neurol Sci 202:5-11.
Dicou E, Perrot S, Menkes CJ, Masson C, Nerriere V. 1996. Nerve growth factor
(NGF) autoantibodies and NGF in the synovial fluid: implications in spondylarthropathies.
Autoimmunity 24:1-9.
Ezendam J, Hassing I, Bleumink R, Vos JG, Pieters R. 2004. Hexachlorobenzene-induced
immunopathology in Brown Norway rats is partly mediated by T cells. Toxicol
Sci 78:88-95.
Foster WG, McMahon A, Younglai EV, Jarrell JF, Lecavalier P. 1995. Alterations
in circulating ovarian steroids in hexachlorobenzene-exposed monkeys. Reprod
Toxicol 9:541-548.
Franklin MR, Phillips JD, Kushner JP. 1997. Cytochrome P450 induction, uroporphyrinogen
decarboxylase depression, porphyrin accumulation and excretion, and gender
influence in a 3-week rat model of porphyria cutanea tarda. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
147:289-299.
Gocmen A, Peters HA, Cripps DJ, Morris CR, Dogramaci I. 1986. Porphyria turcica:
hexachlorobenzene-induced porphyria. In: Hexachlorobenzene: Proceedings of
an International Symposium (Morris C, Cabral JR, eds). IARC Sci Publ 77:567-573.
Hahn ME, Goldstein JA, Linko P, Gasiewicz TA. 1989. Interaction of hexachlorobenzene
with the receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in vitro and in
vivo. Evidence that hexachlorobenzene is a weak Ah receptor agonist. Arch
Biochem Biophys 270:344-355.
Hamadeh HK, Bushel PR, Jayadev S, DiSorbo O, Bennett L, Li L, et al. 2002a.
Prediction of compound signature using high density gene expression profiling.
Toxicol Sci 67:232-240.
Hamadeh HK, Bushel PR, Jayadev S, Martin K, DiSorbo O, Sieber S, et al. 2002b.
Gene expression analysis reveals chemical-specific profiles. Toxicol Sci 67:219-231.
Huhn P, Pruijn GJ, van Venrooij WJ, Bachmann M. 1997. Characterization of
the autoantigen La (SS-B) as a dsRNA unwinding enzyme. Nucleic Acids Res 25:410-416.
Jarrell JF, Gocmen A, Akyol D, Brant R. 2002. Hexachlorobenzene exposure
and the proportion of male births in Turkey 1935-1990. Reprod Toxicol
16:65-70.
Jarrell J, Gocmen A, Foster W, Brant R, Chan S, Sevcik M. 1998. Evaluation
of reproductive outcomes in women inadvertently exposed to hexachlorobenzene
in southeastern Turkey in the 1950s. Reprod Toxicol 12:469-476.
Kennedy SW, Wigfield DC. 1990. Dose-response relationships in hexachlorobenzene-induced
porphyria. Biochem Pharmacol 40:1381-1388.
Kleiman de Pisarev DL, Rios de Molina MC, San Martin de Viale LC. 1990. Thyroid
function and thyroxine metabolism in hexachlorobenzene-induced porphyria. Biochem
Pharmacol 39:817-825.
Kuper FC, De Heer E, Van Loveren H, Vos JG. 2002. Immune system. In: Handbook
of Toxicological Pathology Vol 2. (Haschek WM, Rousseaux CG, Wallig MA, eds).
New York:Academic Press, 585-646.
Liu G, Loraine AE, Shigeta R, Cline M, Cheng J, Valmeekam V, et al. 2003.
Netaffx: Affymetrix probesets and annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 31:82-86.
Lockhart DJ, Dong H, Byrne MC, Follettie MT, Gallo MV, Chee MS, et al. 1996.
Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
Nat Biotechnol 14:1675-1680.
Machala M, Matlova L, Svoboda I, Nezveda K. 1996. Induction effects of polychlorinated
biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other widespread aromatic environmental
pollutants on microsomal monooxygenase activities in chick embryo liver. Arch
Toxicol 70:362-367.
Mantovani A, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Sozzani S. 1998. Chemokines and chemokine
receptors during activation and deactivation of monocytes and dendritic cells
and in amplification of Th1 versus Th2 responses. Int J Clin Lab Res 28:77-82.
Michielsen CP, Bloksma N, Ultee A, van Mil F, Vos JG. 1997. Hexachlorobenzene-induced
immunomodulation and skin and lung lesions: a comparison between Brown Norway,
Lewis, and Wistar rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 144:12-26.
Michielsen CC, van Loveren H, Vos JG. 1999. The role of the immune system
in hexachlorobenzene-induced toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 107:783-792.
Michielsen C, Zeamari S, Leusink-Muis A, Vos J, Bloksma N. 2002. The environmental
pollutant hexachlorobenzene causes eosinophilic and granulomatous inflammation
and in vitro airways hyperreactivity in the Brown Norway rat. Arch Toxicol
76:236-247.
Naka T, Nishimoto N, Kishimoto T. 2002. The paradigm of IL-6: from basic
science to medicine. Arthritis Res 4(suppl 3):S233-242.
Perretti M, Gavins FN. 2003. Annexin 1: an endogenous anti-inflammatory protein.
News Physiol Sci 18:60-64.
Queiroz ML, Bincoletto C, Perlingeiro RC, Quadros MR, Souza CA. 1998a. Immunoglobulin
levels in workers exposed to hexachlorobenzene. Hum Exp Toxicol 17:172-175.
Queiroz ML, Quadros MR, Valadares MC, Silveira JP. 1998b. Polymorphonuclear
phagocytosis and killing in workers occupationally exposed to hexachlorobenzene.
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 20:447-454.
Renner G. 1981. Biotransformation of the fungicides hexachlorobenzene and
pentachloronitrobenzene. Xenobiotica 11:435-446.
Roth J, Vogl T, Sorg C, Sunderkotter C. 2003. Phagocyte-specific S100 proteins:
a novel group of proinflammatory molecules. Trends Immunol 24:155-158.
Schielen P, Schoo W, Tekstra J, Oostermeijer HH, Seinen W, Bloksma N. 1993.
Autoimmune effects of hexachlorobenzene in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
122:233-243.
Schreck R, Albermann K, Baeuerle PA. 1992. Nuclear factor kappa B: an oxidative
stress-responsive transcription factor of eukaryotic cells (a review). Free
Radic Res Commun 17:221-237.
Schulte A, Althoff J, Ewe S, Richter-Reichhelm HB. 2002. Two immunotoxicity
ring studies according to OECD TG 407-comparison of data on cyclosporin A and
hexachlorobenzene. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 36:12-21.
Stonard MD, Poli G, De Matteis F. 1998. Stimulation of liver heme oxygenase
in hexachlorobenzene-induced hepatic porphyria. Arch Toxicol 72:355-361.
Thomas RS, Rank DR, Penn SG, Zastrow GM, Hayes KR, Hu T, et al. 2002. Application
of genomics to toxicology research. Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 6):919-923.
Van Birgelen AP. 1998. Hexachlorobenzene as a possible major contributor
to the dioxin activity of human milk. Environ Health Perspect 106:683-688.
Van Birgelen AP, Van der Kolk J, Fase KM, Bol I, Poiger H, Brouwer A, et
al. 1995. Subchronic dose-response study of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 132:1-13.
Van Ommen B, Van Bladeren PJ. 1989. Possible reactive intermediates in the
oxidative biotransformation of hexachlorobenzene. Drug Metab Drug Interact
7:213-243.
Vos JG. 1986. Immunotoxicity of hexachlorobenzene. In: Hexachlorobenzene:
Proceedings of an international symposium Symposium (Morris CR, Cabral JR,
eds). IARC Sci Publ 77:347-356.
Vos JG. 2000. Health effects of hexachlorobenzene and the TEF approach. Environ
Health Perspect 108:A58.
Vos JG, Van Logten MJ, Kreeftenberg JG, Kruizinga W. 1979. Hexachlorobenzene-induced
stimulation of the humoral response in rats. Ann NY Acad Science 320:535-550.
Last Updated: May 5, 2004
|
|
 |
|
| |